Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Marguerite
At least get off the Holier than thou soap box. It doesn't play well with the Independents and The Social Conservatives already know where he Stands.

Against Birth Control and Against Abortion.

175 posted on 03/10/2012 7:48:28 PM PST by Bailee (Santorum vs Santorum http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELbCuLEe7Sw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: Bailee

You what’s also ironic?

If social conservatism is all you care about, then there’s still no reason to pick Santorum over Newt.

I mean, we know Newt would choose strict constructionist judges who won’t push this “living, breathing” Constitution nonsense, and who won’t suddenly find a constitutional mandate for special rights for gays.

Newt is pro-life. I mean, he’s the guy who shepherded the PBA ban through Congress, and to Clinton’s desk, that first time around. People can whine about that “implantation” kerfluffle from a couple of month’s back, but the fact is, that discussion exists more in the realm of insular Catholic theology than it does on any practical level in dealing with abortion. Newt would oppose abortion, and there’s no real reason to say he wouldn’t.

Newt has a proven record on welfare reform, which is frankly about as truly pro-family as anything you can do. Welfare is undermining and destroying the basis of the family unit in this country. Newt helped to pass the reform that slowed this down for a few years, at least.

I’m very social conservative myself, and I see no reason to trust Santorum more on these issues than Newt.


180 posted on 03/10/2012 7:59:15 PM PST by Yashcheritsiy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson