Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Make My Day Better' bill to grant businesses self-defense protections fails in Colo. Senate
therepublic.com ^ | 5 March, 2012 | IVAN MORENO Associated Press

Posted on 03/06/2012 7:23:05 AM PST by marktwain

DENVER — Colorado Senate Democrats rejected legislation to expand self-defense protections for businesses, saying Monday the proposal would give too much leeway to use deadly force against suspected intruders.

"This dramatically changes self-defense," said Sen. Rollie Heath, a Democrat from Boulder.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: banglist; business; castle; co
The bill is not dead. The rejection of this bill by the comittee Democrats was expected.
1 posted on 03/06/2012 7:23:17 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain
George Hughes, the police chief at the Colorado School of Mines, said the group opposed the bill because it would "open the door to allow a shop owner to use deadly force in circumstances where a customer has a complaint, becomes vocally aggressive, refuses to leave."

Is it too early to declare a Most Hysterical Lie of 2012 winner?

2 posted on 03/06/2012 7:30:34 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

“this dramatically changes self-defense”........
Yes, yes it does....


3 posted on 03/06/2012 7:35:47 AM PST by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
The bill is not dead. The rejection of this bill by the comittee Democrats was expected.

Is there a way to bypass the committee to force it to the floor?

4 posted on 03/06/2012 7:37:09 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Sounds like the DemocRATS are concerned about losing some of their constituents.


5 posted on 03/06/2012 7:39:30 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
“”It's power over the use of lethal force in order to protect property, and I'm not willing to go there,” he said.”

Treasonous base t*rd, isn't he? The Founders had no difficulty stating property was sacrosanct. CommieMan, on the other hand ......

6 posted on 03/06/2012 8:59:59 AM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson