[Conscience of a Conservative]

Jeesh. Computer generated and computer viewing are not the same. How far you guys will go to avoid the truth. Review all the Hawaii Department of Health descriptions of exactly what a computer generated ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ is. You can also read White House General Counsel Bob Bauer's description of what a computer generated birth certificate from Hawaii is. It is an abstract of an original birth certificate created in a computer and then printed out from the computer.

You do not need to get a ‘waiver’ from Hawaii in order to get a computer generated birth certificate. Obama says he asked for a ‘waiver’ to get a photocopy of his original birth certificate. Hawaii granted his request and say they gave him photocopies. What you see on the White House website is not a scanned photocopy. It's very simple. The minutia of all the different ways the document was forged are secondary.

The only evidence you have cited for your argument that the document was "computer generated" is the pixellation and . I'm pointing out that there is another version of the document, also released on the same day, that does not have the inconsistent pixellation and layering:

If, as you assert, Dunham's signature was computer-generated (as opposed to being an actual ink-pen signature), how could there be a version of the document that has an ink-pen signature for Dunham?

[Brown Deer]

I'm pointing out that there is another version of the document, also released on the same day, that does not have the inconsistent pixellation and layering:

It was a photograph. The document released by the White House was a proven forgery!

Here, go learn something: MCSO: Obama Eligibility Cold Case Investigation (Full Press Conference)