Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehring
For the sake of our country and to prevent Mitt Romney from getting the GOP nomination,

Please wake up !

The time of arguing on who's candidate is best is over.

We have to stop Romney from getting the nomination and if Newt were to drop out or Newt's supporters would throw their support to Rick Santroum, Romney will be the big loser after Super Tuesday.

However ?

If Romney is not given a big lose on Super Tuesday ?

Then ?

Both Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum,
and their supporters would be the big losers with gaining nothing.. you want that ?


Rick could have won in Michigan with 60,000 votes if Newt's supporters would have helped Rick with a win there...

The fighting among the Newt supporters and Sanotrum supporters has to stop now, now is the time to make the difficult decision, and the only thing that we can even relate and remotely agree on is that Romney is not the one for us to be the GOP nominee.
27 posted on 03/04/2012 7:10:38 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: American Constitutionalist

Newt supports would say the same thing. They have been calling for Sanatorum to drop out.


32 posted on 03/04/2012 7:26:42 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: American Constitutionalist

Its called a primary for a reason.


47 posted on 03/04/2012 7:50:17 AM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: American Constitutionalist

“Rick could have won in Michigan with 60,000 votes if Newt’s supporters would have helped Rick with a win there...

The fighting among the Newt supporters and Sanotrum supporters has to stop now, now is the time to make the difficult decision, and the only thing that we can even relate and remotely agree on is that Romney is not the one for us to be the GOP nominee. “

So we are supposed to “take on for the team” to push a candidate we consider to be weaker than wet cardboard?

I dont seem to remember the desire of the Santorum people to be so helpful to Newt at any time.

We stand by a candidate that has been unjustly slandered by the GOP establishment. We are not doing it just to then vote for the guy that happily benefited, and participated, from that.


54 posted on 03/04/2012 8:02:32 AM PST by VanDeKoik (If case you are wondering, I'm supporting Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: American Constitutionalist
You act as if Santorum is a viable alternative to Romney and the establishment; he's every bit their guy. Alternative? It simply isn't so and electability is dubious.

Dig into his record. Inspect his baggage. Discovery why he really lost reelection by that 18 points, the most for an incumbent senator in over 25 years.

He slipped into the Senate on the back of Newt's 1994 Republican Revolution, he stayed in the Senate when W won in 2000 and when he didn't have coat tails to ride, he was swept away on his own record. He has not won among women and lost 61% of their vote in 2006.

70 posted on 03/04/2012 9:13:40 AM PST by newzjunkey (Santorum: 18-point loss, voted for Sotomayor, proposed $550M on top of $900M Amtrak budget...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson