Posted on 03/02/2012 1:18:39 AM PST by U-238
I worry more about their ability to detect thermal wakes.
Considering that the only good fight is an unfair fight where the adversary has no real chance, the need to invest in technology and systems that provide an overwhelming advantage, as well as continually upgrading current systems and equipment, is a must. Which means that those who say only A-10s are needed (as someone said here in 2011) because they are so effective in Iraq/Afghanistan should remain cognisant that against a near-peer adversary they wouldn't be as hot.
Anyways, as the article wonders, who is the target for all the recent Chinese military expansion? Easy enough question to answer.
You can detect a “wake” by satellite.
I agree with you
and Bill Clinton made sure China had sattelites.
and Bill Clinton made sure China had sattelites.
—
and Bill Clinton made sure China had thermonuclear weapons ...
The transfer of technology to the PRC from America continues at such a speed via so called “free trade” that AMERICA will become the near peer in this generation.
We are oblivious, brainwashed to not look at what “free trade” is doing to America.
The denial on the right, is frightening.
Otherwise logical conservatives simply refuse to think about the possibility, America very truly can be surpassed, exactly the way we are doing things.
“Free trade” is a way to defeat our own nation.
ping
ping
And then the drones will learn that it is the Chinese that “feed” them and then they’ll demand that they be allowed to sit in the hangar and be fed and and do nothing and then you have Democrat drones.
Why? It's because it is a missing link and they know if they publicize the 'problem' that some self-absorbed American engineer will go right to work on it and publish the answer somewhere on the internet.
The Chinks are going public with this so we will develope it and they can steal it.
My fear is that they either know they now have us technologically and that we can’t catch up, or they have developed the next “secret weapon”.
Look through history, the “secret weapon” or technology advance has always been the war winner. bronze, iron, horse shoes, bridle, cannon, armor, aircraft, nuclear weapons.
What is next? An ability to take out all of an enemies nukes? Or, antimatter weapons?
The anti-matter possibility you mentioned is very intriguing indeed. I’m afraid that the administration is deliberately giving up our nukes so the Chinese and Russians are getting more brazen by the minute now.
Nothing all that interesting, new or unusual about “Genetic” algorithms - I implemented this for an image processing class in 1997 and it wasn’t new then.
ping
Its a sub heading of artificial intelligence.Every organism has a set of rules, a blueprint so to speak, describing how that organism is built up from the tiny building blocks of life.Genetic Algorithms are a way of solving problems by mimicking the same processes mother nature uses
Quantities measured in grams will be required to achieve destructive effect comparable with conventional nuclear weapons; one gram of antimatter annihilating with one gram of matter produces 180 terajoules, the equivalent of 42.96 kilotons of TNT .Unlike thermonuclear weaponry, positron weaponry would leave behind “no nuclear residue”, such as the nuclear fallout generated by the nuclear fission reactions which power nuclear weapons. Antimatter is expensive to produce though. The cost of a gram of the stuff is 2.5 million dollars and it would take 250 years to produce typical hydrogen bomb levels. But I love it.Fantastic idea.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.