Replies

The lefties conceed there are abnomalies in the document, saying that there are the product of:

1. Optical character recognition
2. Optimization - in which the document is digitally shrunk to permit for a smaller attached doc

But when you do this stuff, the computer RANDOMLY creates NUMEROUS layers for different stuff on the doc.

Instead, when investigators examined the doc, the see FEW layers, and they layers are NOT random; all the validation stamps are in the SAME LAYER, not different ones.

A human MADE those layers quite deliberately.

They even have a witness in Chicago saying that Ayer’s mother openly introduced Obama to him/her as, “a FOREIGN exchange student”....!!!

Which may be the most damning evidence of all, accepting grants as a "foreign student" to which he was not qualified to receive.

This may be the catch-22.

Is he or isn't he? Only his document forger knows for sure.

But when you do this stuff, the computer RANDOMLY creates NUMEROUS layers for different stuff on the doc.
Instead, when investigators examined the doc, the see FEW layers, and they layers are NOT random; all the validation stamps are in the SAME LAYER, not different ones.

A human MADE those layers quite deliberately.

Except that there is at least one place in the document where there are words that are split between multiple layers (e.g., the first half of a word is on one layer, the rest on another). For example, the (pre-printed) line "Name of Hospital or Institution (If not in hospital or institution, give street address)" is split among two layers as follows:

one layer contains "N___ _f H______l __ I__________ (If ___ __ h_______ __ ____________ ____ ______ add____)"

another layer contains "_ame o_ _ospita_ or _nstitution ___ not in _ospital or institution, give street ___ress_"

If a human made the layers deliberately, why would they split that sentence (or any of the other words/lines that are so split) across different layers?