[Timber Rattler]

I said the “massacre” was greatly exaggerated.

And you would still be wrong.

There was a sack. Not as Fulcher described it.

Oh, I guess the fact that he was there and saw it first hand doesn't lend any credibility to his account.

Are you dense or just willfully ignorant.

[Houghton M.]

Any intelligent person knows that eyewitness accounts can vary. Historians’ rule no. 1 is to evaluate all sources critically.

Calling me names doesn’t change the fact that you are the one violating the basic FR principle: evaluate things critically.

All I said is that most historians do not take Fulcher literally. They have discovered Muslim eyewitness sources that contradict him.

They are just being historians. You are being obstinate.