To: cripplecreek
Yes.
I don’t really have much of a preference between him and Newt, but the attacks on Santorum should stop. No one was criticizing Newt in the way Santorum is being criticized. I think a bunch of the Santorum haters may actually prefer Romney but are forced to express that support for him in criticisms of Santorum.
26 posted on
02/25/2012 1:48:27 PM PST by
WPaCon
To: WPaCon
No one was criticizing Newt in the way Santorum is being criticized.
The hell they weren't. The attacks against Newt were far worse.
29 posted on
02/25/2012 1:51:44 PM PST by
Utmost Certainty
(Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
To: WPaCon
Actually I think a fair number of the Santorum attackers are Paulbots. You might have noticed that they’ve become virtually invisible around here lately.
I’m not even getting any Ron Paul FReepmail spam.
31 posted on
02/25/2012 1:52:55 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: WPaCon
>> “No one was criticizing Newt in the way Santorum is being criticized.” <<
.
You’re deluded.
86 posted on
02/25/2012 8:49:09 PM PST by
editor-surveyor
(No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
To: WPaCon
I dont really have much of a preference between him and Newt, but the attacks on Santorum should stop. No one was criticizing Newt in the way Santorum is being criticized. I think a bunch of the Santorum haters may actually prefer Romney but are forced to express that support for him in criticisms of Santorum.
For the record, there have always been Santorum haters on FR. They are mostly from the liberal-tarian crowd, many of whom are multiple-zot retreads who used to congregate over at the now-defunct ClownePosse anti-FR site. I would wager that a fair number of them are back posting other other handles.
88 posted on
02/25/2012 8:58:49 PM PST by
Antoninus
(Mitt Romney -- attempting to execute a hostile take-over of the Republican Party.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson