YES, “positive law” trumps anything you have tried to come up with.
Madison trumps Vattel.
Congressional legislation trumps Vattel.
Even IF a Court, EVER, agreed with you, if legislation has been enacted, since that Court case, that legislation would trump any such Court ruling.
This is how the system works.
What is to keep you from claiming that “Natural Law” should dictate inheritance or divorce or child custody?
Natural Law and Common Law are seen as archaic, harsh, and very out dated in these areas.
It is absurd to think that Vattel can write a book, which some Founders read, and that, therefore, we should use Vattel’s definitions for every legal term in the Constitution.
The Founders also read, and for the most part FOLLOWED, English Common Law, which supports my view, not yours.
YES, positive law trumps anything you have tried to come up with.
I haven't tried to "come up with" anything. I'm asking you a question based upon a reply you made and you refuse to answer it.
A person who becomes a citizen, based on the laws of this country,in force at the moment of birth, is a Natural Born Citizen.
Which laws? Are positive laws what make them so?
Nothing that you wrote directly answers my question so would you mind doing so.
And here is something that tells me you know all too well what the issue is really about and how it should rightly be viewed.
Congressional legislation trumps Vattel.
See, Congress can only pass legislation that concerns naturalization, not natural born citizenship. You know it and you don't want to admit it as doing so completely disintegrates your whole disingenuous argument.
Here are some words for you by Madison...
@House of Representatives, Rule of Naturalization 3--4 Feb. 1790