Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

I’m not one to call the shots here, but this circular firing squad on Santorum has to stop.

If shilling for Romney here is a no-no, then recklessly tearing down Santorum should be a no-no, since it’s essentially the same thing.

That’s not to say that criticism of Santorum shouldn’t be allowed, but some people’s main purpose here is to troll every Santorum thread and bash him at every opportunity.


13 posted on 02/17/2012 3:45:54 PM PST by WPaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: WPaCon

As I see it, virtually every candidate still standing has voted in favor of or supported subsidies in some form or another.


16 posted on 02/17/2012 3:50:26 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon

http://www.rickfacts.com/?page_id=2


17 posted on 02/17/2012 3:51:06 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon
If shilling for Romney here is a no-no, then recklessly tearing down Santorum should be a no-no, since it’s essentially the same thing.

Absolute nonsense. Attacking socialism and liberal policies are what we should focus on no matter where they come from. Supporting conservatism is what we're about. Hence that is essentially the same as supporting Newt Gingrich and advising against all of Romney's policies and half of Santorum's.

There has been a massive rise in criticism of Newt Gingrich ever since Santorum's surge, which is wrong and essentially the same thing as shilling for Obama.


18 posted on 02/17/2012 3:53:39 PM PST by JediJones (Just say NO to the MittRick system! Disenfranchise the establishment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon; All; Jim Robinson

“I’m not one to call the shots here, but this circular firing squad on Santorum has to stop.

If shilling for Romney here is a no-no, then recklessly tearing down Santorum should be a no-no, since it’s essentially the same thing.

That’s not to say that criticism of Santorum shouldn’t be allowed, but some people’s main purpose here is to troll every Santorum thread and bash him at every opportunity.”


Well said. Especially with Michigan coming up and Newt is not even playing in Willard the Lib’s home state.

BEAT ROMNEY there and he’s DEEPLY wounded. What say you, Jim? : )


20 posted on 02/17/2012 4:04:49 PM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon; PSYCHO-FREEP

And as you can see, Psycho Freep both shills for Romney and attacks Santorum simultaneously. He posts links to the website by pro-Romney SuperPAC “Restore Our Future”. He’s linked to that website on multiple threads now.


81 posted on 02/18/2012 12:57:27 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson