1 posted on
02/16/2012 1:25:51 PM PST by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Good, CNN sucks.
2 posted on
02/16/2012 1:27:40 PM PST by
b4its2late
(Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the former.)
To: BenLurkin
Certainly took the Republicans a long time to wise up to the Clinton News Network’s shenanigans.
3 posted on
02/16/2012 1:28:13 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: BenLurkin
Republican Debates on CNN are about as objective as PETA reviewing steakhouses.
4 posted on
02/16/2012 1:29:52 PM PST by
Keith in Iowa
(Willard Romney, purveyor of the world's finest bullmitt. | FR Class of 1998 |)
To: BenLurkin
Well, it’s not like they were going to ask any questions that MATTER to the American public, or EVER mention the Holy Words, “Barack Obama”, anyway.
5 posted on
02/16/2012 1:32:53 PM PST by
tcrlaf
(Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
To: BenLurkin
What are they afraid of?6 posted on
02/16/2012 1:33:33 PM PST by
McGruff
(Think in bold colors not pale pastels.)
To: BenLurkin
Not good. This helps romney. John mccain was saying he did not want to have debates anymore a few weeks back. Townhall today, who leans romney and has ann coulter as a writter, had a poll question asking if the more debates were pointless and overdone. Approx. 75% said no more debates. Right. Sounds like CNN is working with the “establishment”.
7 posted on
02/16/2012 1:34:45 PM PST by
Linda Frances
(Only God can change a heart, but we can pray for hearts to be changed.)
To: BenLurkin
Santorum and Romney feel that they have succeeded.
8 posted on
02/16/2012 1:35:41 PM PST by
ansel12
(Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
To: BenLurkin
Chicken chitz afraid Newt will have a good debate on his own turf with a friendly audience.
10 posted on
02/16/2012 1:38:04 PM PST by
Josh Painter
("We intend to change Washington, not accomodate it." - Newt Gingrich)
To: BenLurkin
Maybe some conservative groups could put one together before super Tuesday. I know fox won't help since they love romney. MAYBE RUSH COULD DO IT. IF ROMNEY DOESN'T SHOW UP IT WILL LOOK BAD FOR HIM. SOUNDS LIKE HE IS AFRAID OF THE COMPETITION. SHOULD HE BE OUR NOMINEE,IF HE CAN'T HANDLE DEBATING FELLOW REPUBLICANS? HOW IS HE GOING TO HANDLE OBAMA?
You think we could get thousands of people to ask Rush to do it? What a show that would be! Romney can spend his time and money destroying everyone else. Newt and the others rely on debates to get there message out.
13 posted on
02/16/2012 1:45:37 PM PST by
Linda Frances
(Only God can change a heart, but we can pray for hearts to be changed.)
To: BenLurkin
It sounds like they’re all tired of the bait questions and the ones presented to them by the White House.
14 posted on
02/16/2012 1:46:16 PM PST by
tobyhill
To: BenLurkin
Good, CNN is just an O’Blasphemer Mouth Piece and should be treated as such.
15 posted on
02/16/2012 1:46:44 PM PST by
makomako
To: BenLurkin
No debates is going to help romney. He can spend on his money destroying our candidates & they don’t have the money & now the free debate time to respond to romneys hits on them.
16 posted on
02/16/2012 1:58:04 PM PST by
Linda Frances
(Only God can change a heart, but we can pray for hearts to be changed.)
To: BenLurkin
Its more likely the candidates weren’t up to two hours of questions concerning contraception.
17 posted on
02/16/2012 2:00:39 PM PST by
skeeter
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson