he makes a lot of counterpoints to alot of the arguments raged against newt often:
* He might have big ideas, but the congress will keep him inline...
* He’s an insider with all that attendant knowledge, but also was a reformer, and promises to be one again...
* he shut the govt down... which rush and levin, who support RS were pleading for boehner to do... And stood up for the country, lost seats, but put country first...
* the debates don’t even require comment
* THE MEDIA - Conservatives have been praying for someone who isn’t afraid of the media, yet they vote for fawning romney and pandering rick... this is a really good package in this article..
OH MY GOD THIS IS A REAL FIND... THANK YOU SO MUCH..
Not being Obama is not enogh.
It happens that among the actual panel, I think that the best qualified to beat Obama is Newt Gingrich.
He has the fighting spirit to trash Obama and tear any of his arguments to pieces, he has the experience how to reform the government and administration, he has the best economic plan to redress America, and he is probably the only one he isn't running for personal glory, but because he profoundly thinks that the Republic is in lethal danger. This is Reagan's legacy in Newt's mind.
As he himself said, he was driven back to politics by the Supreme Court decision that "In God we trust" is "unconstitutional". He counts to fight against anyone who tries to pervert the Constitution.
He made mistakes in his 50-year-long presence in American politics, but WHO hasn't? However, there is a chasm between Newt and the other contenders. No one can hold him a candle as far as intelligence, knowledge and experience are concerned. I've made a through research into his acts, writings and "Contract for America 21st century" before I came to this conclusion.