Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Since Betty “is no worse off being dead than totally disabled,” they opine, it is no worse “to kill Betty than to totally disable her.” Not only that, but according to the authors, “there is nothing bad about death or killing other than disability or disabling,” and since she is already so debilitated, then nothing wrong is done by harvesting her organs and thus ending her biological existence. And thus, in the space of not quite five pages, killing the innocent ceases to be wrong and the intrinsic dignity of human life is thrown out the window, transforming vulnerable human beings into objectified and exploitable human resources.

This explains perfectly what the culture of death is trying to do to all of humanity.

1 posted on 02/11/2012 2:39:37 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on 02/11/2012 2:40:54 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BykrBayb; floriduh voter; Lesforlife; Sun
Ping
3 posted on 02/11/2012 2:42:53 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


4 posted on 02/11/2012 2:44:09 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Remembering Terri Schiavo . . .

Remember jackals. . . Karma's a bitch!

5 posted on 02/11/2012 2:45:21 PM PST by ArchAngel1983 (Arch Angel- on guard / Wenn Sie etwas sehen, sagen Sie etwas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

once you have no problem with killing the unborn... harvesting organs from the infirm is small step

when does it become self defense to protect ones family from those seeking todo them harm?


6 posted on 02/11/2012 2:46:48 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Amazing how little humans have learned.

Once you posit that you can murder the innocent for the benefit of the living and you can murder based on the inconvenience of location then you have stricken down all law regarding murder.

You can no longer logically condemn any murder.

When you have reached that state then why would it be wrong for governments to murder anyone inconvenient for them. At least under the Nazi's and Stalin they were sufficiently ashamed of their actions to try to keep them hidden. The new breed wants to declare evil good and shout it from the housetops.

7 posted on 02/11/2012 2:53:36 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (We kneel to no prince but the Prince of Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Decades ago there was a Quincy episode dealing with this (Quincy was a “medical examiner”...a doctor who works for the police to try to figure out why someone died). In that episode, they raised the question of whether a person was declared dead earlier than necessary, because he was carrying an organ donor card (i.e., it’s critical to harvest organs as soon as possible from a dying person, before they ‘spoil’). They concluded, no, he was allowed to die completely before they went after his organs. While that may have been the conclusion on that episode, I immediately terminated my organ-donor check box on my driver’s license.


8 posted on 02/11/2012 3:01:37 PM PST by BobL (I don't care about his past - Santorum will BRING THE FIGHT to Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
That's why they want us all to be wards of the state, so they can decide what's "best" for all of us.
We know what it will lead to eventually, the political class will somehow get an unrestricted supply of replacement organs from those judged to be infirm, useless, criminal or inconvenient.

11 posted on 02/11/2012 3:16:53 PM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Just interested. So if a person has been in an automobile accident, and the paramedics put that person on life support at the scene, is then later determined there is no brain activity and the person will die if removed, life support is removed and organs are harvested, is this considered euthanasia?


12 posted on 02/11/2012 3:18:14 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

There would be no organ waiting lists if it were legal for donors and their heirs to be compensated for organs provided for transplant.


13 posted on 02/11/2012 3:26:57 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Author of BullionBible.com - Makes You a Precious Metal Expert, Guaranteed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Wait until new organs can actually extend a person’s life beyond a normal lifespan. Larry Niven talked about this in some of his sci-fi, and not in a good way. From wiki:

“...the problem led to a repressive society almost unrecognizable by today’s standards. Since the average citizens wished to extend their lives, the world government sought to increase the supply by using condemned criminals to supply the organ banks. When this failed to meet the demand, citizens would vote for the death penalty for more and more trivial crimes. First violent crimes, then theft, tax evasion, false advertising, and even traffic violations became punishable by the organ banks.”

He was talking about “organ legging” back in the late 60’s.

Freegards


18 posted on 02/11/2012 4:16:56 PM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
The concept of "brain death" was invented to justify harvesting organs while the heart was still beating and the lungs were still working. There is no empirical justification for the concept.

Dr. Frankenstein is still alive and works for the National Institutes of Health.

20 posted on 02/11/2012 5:31:25 PM PST by JoeFromSidney (New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. A primer on armed revolt. Available form Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I have a better idea. Some of them have to be healthy enough for “donation.”

Lets harvest the organs of the scumbags on death row. Give them a chance to REALLY repay society for their crime.

And it might speed up they “payment schedule” a bit.


22 posted on 02/11/2012 5:46:09 PM PST by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
one of the authors is a US federal government employee. link

Be afraid be very afraid.

23 posted on 02/11/2012 5:47:30 PM PST by LadyDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee; Graewoulf; VinceASA; Monkey Face; RIghtwardHo; pieces of time; Warthog-2; Tzar; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.


25 posted on 02/11/2012 6:10:15 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson