I’ve not followed this issue closely but I keep reading the complaint of using ‘robo-signers.’ Is that a euphemism for some other behavior?
Whether I sign a document, hire someone to sign a document, set up a robo-signer to sign a document, or get an NEA grant to find an artist to sign on my behalf using artist grade urine, I am still liable and bound by documents that were signed under my direction.
If the foreclosures are in error that should be spoken of, not the manner in which they were signed. What is the real issue referred to by ‘robo signing?’
they litereally used a robotic device to sign the documents.
It is the same pen signer as mass mailings.
The banks even made up names of the persons doing the “signing”.
(the machine uses a ball point pen to create a signature. The banks created fake “originals”)
These numbers are a joke.
I wonder which of the Officers of the 5 banks that committed these multi-billion $$ frauds are going to jail?