It would have been interesting if another plaintiff just challenged simply on the age requirement and nothing else.
The remedy to that would be easy - a certified, verified, on real security paper with a real seal BC - either flavor.
But they will not let those frauds into court. Or no real attorney would be caught presenting them in a court.
I wonder if Malihi ‘considers’ Obama over the age of 35 - since no evidence of even that requirement was presented.
Right. Obama has presented no proof of ANYTHING.
And how is somebody supposed to prove a negative? Of COURSE the burden of proof is on the candidate, just as Malihi implied when he told Obama that being an incumbent didn’t mean he didn’t have the requirement of being qualified. Being an incumbent doesn’t count as being qualified because a person can be incumbent without having proven anything, if nobody happened to challenge eligibility when they ran before.