Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

It would have been interesting if another plaintiff just challenged simply on the age requirement and nothing else.

The remedy to that would be easy - a certified, verified, on real security paper with a real seal BC - either flavor.

But they will not let those frauds into court. Or no real attorney would be caught presenting them in a court.

I wonder if Malihi ‘considers’ Obama over the age of 35 - since no evidence of even that requirement was presented.


22 posted on 02/08/2012 1:27:48 PM PST by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: bluecat6

Right. Obama has presented no proof of ANYTHING.

And how is somebody supposed to prove a negative? Of COURSE the burden of proof is on the candidate, just as Malihi implied when he told Obama that being an incumbent didn’t mean he didn’t have the requirement of being qualified. Being an incumbent doesn’t count as being qualified because a person can be incumbent without having proven anything, if nobody happened to challenge eligibility when they ran before.


37 posted on 02/08/2012 4:26:41 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson