[Thane_Banquo]

Santorum made noobsauce out of Romney on this issue.

[cuban leaf]

Actually, if something doesn’t change, “Getting angry” will be tame compared to what many will be tempted to do. As Gerald Celente says, “When people lose everything, and have nothing to lose, they lose it.”

If that happens to a few thousand people, well, that’s “their problem”. When it happens to a few million, they tend to make it everybody’s problem. I expect it to reach critical mass before the November elections. It’s one reason I do not expect Obama to finish his term. He is ill prepared to handle any “clear and present” dangers. When speeches don’t work, even in the short term, it is going to get very rough for all of us, but especially for Obama.

[Pollster1]

When it comes to the rapid spread of socialism, and especially ObamaCare, it is worth getting angry.

[Dr. Sivana]

pay the state for the cost of providing them free care.

Wow... talk about Orwellian.

I think it was P.J. O'Rourke who said "if you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"

[newzjunkey]

After attacking Newt on the point for past support of the concept, we now see Senator Sanctimonious was for a healthcare mandate when he himself ran for senate in 1994.

[Qbert]

"Moments later, as the discussion over Romneycare and Obamacare continued, Romney rebuked Santorum, saying, “First of all, it's not worth getting angry about.”

Unbelievable. Absoutely unbelievable.

[ex-snook]

Santorum should have been asked who should pay for hospital treatment for someone without insurance.
1] Hospital and doctors should work for nothing
2] The State should pick up the charge
3] Federal govt should pick up the charge
4] Banks should be required to give the patient a loan
5] What else?

[manic4organic]

How many debates have they had? And someone FINALLY attacked Romney on his biggest weakness.