Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tulsa Ramjet

RE: Romney: No

Romney: No ( except for Massachusetts, in which case it is a resounding YES ).


37 posted on 01/27/2012 8:18:14 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

No, i mean have him answer now as part of their policy and as a requirement for being nominee. Put him on the spot. Then he can’t go back.

I think many of these candidates of done things in the past that they probably wouldn’t do now. have them commit to it.


41 posted on 01/27/2012 8:48:33 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Dude, i just want Obama out. I get a headache thinking about it.


42 posted on 01/27/2012 8:49:48 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I do believe there is a difference between an individual mandate at the state and federal levels.

If you don’t like the laws in your state, you can move to always move to another state.

Romney is a liar because he campaigned in 2007/08 on an individual mandate on the federal level. He basically wanted to implement Romneycare nationwide at that time. Now he pretends as if he is a big 10th Amendment guy.


47 posted on 01/27/2012 9:25:46 AM PST by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson