Posted on 01/26/2012 3:00:25 AM PST by veritas2002
You are not alone veritas2002.
NO RINOs.
Given that I agree....and feel (operative word here is "feel") the same way as you, I won't repeat all of it here.
However, try this idea out.
On the national ballot, should there not be a "no" box (or "against" if you prefer) next to the "for" box?? In this manner, you could truly show you intentions, and have the same privelege our federal and most of our state representatives have when they vote either "yay" or "nay" (yes or no) on a person or measure.
However, we, the voting public, have not been given this priviledge, and so our "vote" is really a "choice".
I am deadly and solidly against that...and have been forced to make a choice for - believe it or not - more years (tho not many more) than have you.
So this time 'round - just like back in '08, I will go to the voting booth with head held high, back straight, stout of heart, and firm of mind and with all the vehemence and ill-will in me, "choose" AGAINST the stain!
Try this mind-set; it might suffice until a truly choosable republican comes along. I fear that won't be this year tho...hence the need for "mind games". But...anytime I can choose against the stain and what is represented by the stain, I'm satisfied....not happy, mind you, but satisfied.
Bump.
The Tokyo rove’s don’t care
Another non-voter if Romany is on the ballot. I made that vow last year when I was forced to vote for McCain, but had no vote in the primary. I will vote on everything else.
if obama salaama is re-elected, we will NEVER!! get rid of him!!!!
see zimbabwe
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.