Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HereInTheHeartland
Seems unbelievable some thing that old could still be flying where cutting edge tech is needed.

Well, somrthing needs to scout ahead of the B-52s.

I don't see the logic in this one. A big part of the budget, bigger than the high tech toys, is mundane things like salaries and fuel. Having unmanned vehicles should be able to cut down on both.

15 posted on 01/24/2012 6:46:21 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Vince Ferrer

I have read that the U-2 is an EXTREMELY difficult and dangerous plane to fly. Certainly, an unmanned plane would do a lot of things better. So, I don’t get it. Pilots (and their training) are REALLY expensive.

The SR-71 was extremely expensive to fly, but it was built in an era where money was no object because there was no alternative, and what it provided was priceless, especially then. I doubt if there is anything in terms of surveillance that satellites couldn’t do now better and cheaper. Still, the SR-71 may remain the pinnacle of American aerospace and mechanical engineering, when “absolutely impossible” was merely difficult and expensive.


17 posted on 01/24/2012 6:57:55 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson