Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/24/2012 10:40:25 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Somebody on this very site said they would pull this with the foreclosures...

Government subsidized section 8 rental properties ... Here comes the rest of the 0bama stash!

2 posted on 01/24/2012 10:46:16 AM PST by EBH (God Humbles Nations, Leaders, and Peoples before He uses them for His Purpose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Oh, and it’s not like this is going to be yet another plan that benefits the large investors - who gobble up the property at cut-rate prices, then turn them into slums that low-income people will then destroy - I mean, it’s not like this hasn’t been done time and again.

How about letting those who lost their jobs, then lost their homes (via short-sale or foreclosure) have an opportunity to puchase another home, after they have obtained employment and are trying to re-establish themselves? These are the folks that I would want as a neighbor, someone who values a home, and will fix it, maintain it, and drive my property values UP.

Oh, nevermind ... those folks aren’t on the Gov’t dole; and probably don’t vote DEM in large blocks .... what was I thinking?


3 posted on 01/24/2012 10:47:58 AM PST by Hodar ( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The houses that will be "given" (taxpayers will pay the rent) to "low income people" (aka, inner-city blacks) will wind up looking like ALL the public housing of the inner-cities, which is comparable to the Beirut sections of town.

People who don't have income (other than welfare), and have never worked for a living or paid for their own home, do NOT take care of someone else's "FREE RENT PROPERTY", period.

4 posted on 01/24/2012 10:51:08 AM PST by traditional1 (Free speech for me.....not for thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Housing projects are the thing of the past, zero will now redistribute. The entitlement crowd in the housing projects will be movin on up to a residential nieghborhood fully subsidized by the government and exploited by his realstate management friends


5 posted on 01/24/2012 10:51:39 AM PST by ronnie raygun (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The houses that will be "given" (taxpayers will pay the rent) to "low income people" (aka, inner-city blacks) will wind up looking like ALL the public housing of the inner-cities, which is comparable to the Beirut sections of town.

People who don't have income (other than welfare), and have never worked for a living or paid for their own home, do NOT take care of someone else's "FREE RENT PROPERTY", period.

6 posted on 01/24/2012 10:51:48 AM PST by traditional1 (Free speech for me.....not for thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
He said there is a delicate formula that will attract investors to buy and rehab properties. That said, he agrees that there is lots of cash on the sidelines waiting to get back in.

If there is all this cash on the sidelines...then what do they need the incentive for? If it is still too risky of a market and a "delicate" forumula...then with the government involved it is epic failure...AGAIN!

7 posted on 01/24/2012 10:53:32 AM PST by EBH (God Humbles Nations, Leaders, and Peoples before He uses them for His Purpose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Ah, and I presume that our “genius” lib economists and (much less than genius) MSM dregs have already calculated that those actions will not depress the housing market at all.

Hopefully, all with room temp IQ or above realize the vapid stupidity of this plan.


9 posted on 01/24/2012 10:59:58 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It’s unbelievable! But, WAIT! It’s Obama and Fannie and Freddy, and the taxpayers picking up the bill, AGAIN.

And it will affect the suburbs when an out-of-work tax payer defaults on his mortgage and a Section 8 house replaces the former owner.


11 posted on 01/24/2012 11:03:06 AM PST by kitkat (Obama, rope and chains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
What liberals envision for the "American Dream:"


13 posted on 01/24/2012 11:06:03 AM PST by ScottinVA (Liberal logic: 0bamacare mandate is acceptable... but voter IDs are unconstitutional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

So that EVERY neighborhood can look like Chicago’s Souf Side.


15 posted on 01/24/2012 11:08:03 AM PST by ScottinVA (Liberal logic: 0bamacare mandate is acceptable... but voter IDs are unconstitutional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The plan would be to convert these properties into rentals, a market that has strengthened recently.

Until they implement this plan.

18 posted on 01/24/2012 11:22:07 AM PST by listenhillary (Look your representatives in the eye and ask if they intend to pay off the debt. They will look away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

So, what is the incentive? Would the government be selling these properties at below market prices? That means the government will be subsidizing those who can AFFORD to buy all these properties. Plus they’ll subsidize the rent payers.

I hope I live long enough to see liberal home owners pitching a bitch about their new neighbors.


20 posted on 01/24/2012 11:36:29 AM PST by Terry Mross (We need a second party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Except for Obama voters, I think most people are aware of Section 8 housing, its impact on neighborhoods and the destruction of large portions of cities.

What is Section 8 on steroids expected to accomplish? Bigger, better, faster destruction?

Just to be on the safe side, why don't we start with Detroit?

23 posted on 01/24/2012 11:46:31 AM PST by Publius6961 (My world was lovely, until it was taken over by parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

so now Obama is trying to federalize the rental market.

kill private rental business.

from each to each.

Obama is a communist, period.


25 posted on 01/24/2012 11:55:28 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Benito Obamalini putting on his Santa Claus suit just in time for November...

Like most liberal ideas, won’t this trigger the opposite outcome? If nothing else, would expect HOA’s, zoning boards, etc. to create rules limiting use the use of residential properties as rental/business units.


27 posted on 01/24/2012 12:06:48 PM PST by Made In The USA (This post may be recorded for quality purposes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

“At issue is a Federal Housing Finance Agency push to develop a program that is expected to use government financing or guarantees.....”

That is really all one needs to read.


28 posted on 01/24/2012 12:07:31 PM PST by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Private markets and private investors are already doing this

(buying properties, foreclosed and otherwise, to rent them out not to sell them),

in those local housing markets where it makes sense,

that is, in housing markets where rental vacancies are down, rent rates are up and investors feel rents alone can cover their investment risk and leave them a good ROI, for a period of time that is not expected, right now, to precitate a sale that will result in a net loss.

Government intereference to artificially spur this kind of process in local markets that cannot attract the private capital for it now, whithout that interference, can and will only produce artificial results that will generate abnormal higher housing market activity now with an expected lower than normal activity later on.


29 posted on 01/24/2012 12:22:47 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

bump


32 posted on 01/24/2012 12:37:20 PM PST by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

FOREIGN Investors eagerly eye U.S. foreclosure rental plan...

Yes, besides the other pointsmentioned above, as a bonus of destroying the American home-owner Obama is going to subsidize foreign purchase.
And Section 8 tax money will go overseas.

It’s Khrushchev’s wettest wet dream come true.


33 posted on 01/24/2012 12:41:25 PM PST by mrsmith (What Tea Party nominee have you found for your House seat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

ala Pogo

We haz met da new landlord

and We Is It!

BigGubamint has unintended consequences.

It crushes any semblance of freedom in this land.

Re-Elect Obama .. and Get the Mission Accomplished


34 posted on 01/24/2012 12:46:50 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson