Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Obama approved fiddling with budget numbers, New Yorker reports
Politico ^ | 1/23/12 | DONOVAN SLACK

Posted on 01/24/2012 8:32:26 AM PST by Qbert

The president prided himself on honesty in his first budget proposal, including the real estimated costs of spending, but Obama later shifted his stance and approved the use of budget gimmickry, according to The New Yorker.

When his aides suggested in late 2009 that he should abandon the honest approach on estimated spending on disaster aid, for example, the president signed off, The New Yorker’s Ryan Lizza reports. Obama also approved of fanciful budget numbers on his signature health care legislation, Lizza wrote:

In the December 20th memo, [Obama aides] resorted to gimmickry...On disaster relief, for example, he had estimated that the government would need twenty billion dollars a year, a figure based on the statistical likelihood of major disasters requiring federal aid.

Now Obama’s aides reminded him that Congress had ignored his “ ‘honest budgeting’ approach,” and perhaps they should, too. They proposed “$5 billion per year for disaster costs.” Obama drew [a] check mark.

The White House could also save billions by fiddling with the way it presented savings from Obama’s health-care-reform bill. Check.

Press Secretary Jay Carney said today that he had not read the entire Lizza article, but he pointed to an independent analysis of the health care law by the Congressional Budget Office showing it is “a deficit-reducer.”

“Let’s let the record be judged for its results,” he said.  


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: corruption; fraud; obama; obamabudget; usbudget
Obama, cooking the books like Enron...

(Link to New Yorker article in original Politico article)

1 posted on 01/24/2012 8:32:31 AM PST by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Qbert

What is the penalty for fraud?


2 posted on 01/24/2012 8:36:19 AM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight
What is the penalty for fraud?

Re-election, I fear.

3 posted on 01/24/2012 8:41:26 AM PST by TruthShallSetYouFree (How bad would an Obama II administration be, without the constraints of re-election?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
“Let’s let the record be judged for its results,” he said.

Jay Carney is apparently letting his inner Nancy Pelousy ("We need to pass the legislation to find out what is in it!") speak out!

4 posted on 01/24/2012 8:43:17 AM PST by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

whew!.. glad you said budget numbers...


5 posted on 01/24/2012 9:03:15 AM PST by dps.inspect (the system is rigged...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

Yup, they are stuck in utilitarian world where the ends justify the means so that the greatest possible number of people can be “happy”.


6 posted on 01/24/2012 9:37:33 AM PST by gcraig (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson