Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

Just a portion of the pass phrase awould enable most cracking algorithms a 98% chance to succeed....


16 posted on 01/24/2012 12:47:20 AM PST by databoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: databoss

In the early days, PGP was open source. It was practically impossible for anyone to insert a back door; too many cryptologists and programmers would’ve seen it and raised the alarm. Now that Symantec owns it . . . who knows?


22 posted on 01/24/2012 1:07:03 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: databoss; Loyal Sedition

Oops, sorry, databoss. My last comment was meant for Loyal Sedition.


23 posted on 01/24/2012 1:12:31 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: databoss
Just a portion of the pass phrase awould enable most cracking algorithms a 98% chance to succeed....

 

It won't help you at all with PGP providing you have a robust enough passphrase. I could give you 10 characters of my PGP passphrase, and you'd still need millenia to decrypt my stuff. That is, if what you're talking about is gaining bits of the passphrase to reduce the size of the brute force attack you'd need to make on it. If you're saying that providing part of the passphrase gains you anything in actual cryptanalysis of the cyphertext, you're way off.

PGP is industrial strength encryption provided you take care with your secret key and passphrase.

91 posted on 01/24/2012 7:43:34 AM PST by zeugma (Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson