Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shortstop7

I think you’re missing my point, probably not putting it well.

Do you think Fred’s endorsement is going to really change anyone’s vote?

I would as the same thing about Bob McDonnell’s endorsement of Romney.

This was just a small question that occurred to me the other day.

GOD! Do I need a life! :-)


147 posted on 01/24/2012 8:26:10 AM PST by Valin (I'm not completely worthless. I can be used as a bad example.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: Valin; Shortstop7
147 posted on Tuesday, January 24, 2012 10:26:10 AM by Valin: “I think you’re missing my point, probably not putting it well. Do you think Fred’s endorsement is going to really change anyone’s vote? I would as the same thing about Bob McDonnell’s endorsement of Romney. This was just a small question that occurred to me the other day.”

What I'm writing is standard political doctrine. Granted, endorsements often are just attempts by a politician to collect a payback later, but endorsements in major races can and sometimes do make a difference.

Endorsements most often make a difference under the following circumstances:

1. The endorser has an active political machine and puts it to work on behalf of the candidate. That can be especially helpful if the endorser is a governor or the mayor of a major city who needs to have a political machine to get elected and uses it aggressively to back other candidates as well. If a person giving an endorsement gets lots of people to volunteer their time and make donations and make phone calls to friends and supporters, it counts a great deal. In addition, a “get out the vote” operation is inherently local, which means a local political leader can carry tremendous influence in actually getting their candidate's supporters to the polls.

2. The endorser represents an ideological cause. If that happens, the endorsement can cause people to say, “If A says B is okay, then A knows B well so I should take their advice.” We have seen that happening with Sarah Palin in several races and with Bob Vander Plaats in Iowa. It's also the role traditionally played by organizations such as Right to Life and the NRA.

3. Celebrity endorsements work. Sorry, but they do... I don't like it, but there are people who really **WILL** vote for a candidate because a prominent actor or musician or sports figure likes them. It doesn't make any sense to me, but it works, and I can't argue with facts.

At the very least, Fred Thompson's endorsement is category #3. Let's not minimize it — there are people who remember his TV show who don't pay attention to normal Republican politics and will listen, especially if he goes on TV ads and says things supporting Gingrich. I can't speak for the level of clout he still has in his home state and its political machine (i.e., #1 and maybe #2) so I will defer to others on that.

151 posted on 01/24/2012 9:44:52 AM PST by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: Valin

Yes, I do believe that the endorsements may matter more this year than in the past. If there are people who have any doubts about Newt’s past work as Speaker, the strong endorsements from solid Conservatives could very well have an impact. Yay for Fred!


162 posted on 01/24/2012 6:25:24 PM PST by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson