" Hey! It's all ball bearings nowadays. Now you prepare that Fetzer valve with some 3-in-1 oil and some gauze pads. And I'm gonna need 'bout ten quarts of anti-freeze, preferably Prestone. No, no make that Quaker State."
Posted on 01/22/2012 2:50:06 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
Airbus has traced the source of the cracking in A380 wing structures to unexpected additional stresses imparted by the manufacturing process, and is confident that its original flight loading calculations for the type are accurate.
The airframer is in the process of changing the manufacturing process and has developed a fix for affected aircraft, as the European Aviation Safety Agency prepares to instruct operators to conduct precautionary inspections.
But Airbus emphasises that the cracking problem - while needing to be addressed, to avoid longer-term issues - is not a safety risk in the short- to medium-term.
The cracks were originally discovered in the rib feet of the Qantas A380 which suffered an uncontained engine failure in November 2010, and has since been under repair in Singapore.
Airbus carries out A380 wing manufacture at the UK plant in Broughton, before transferring the wings to the Toulouse final assembly line. An Airbus wing specialist on the A380 said the airframer's investigations indicated that parts were being stressed at some point during the manufacturing process, which involves drawing the wing skin over the built-up rib and spar assembly before attaching it.
"It's possible to get standing stresses that hadn't been expected," said the specialist, which translated into additional loading during flight. Airbus has already conducted verification flights to measure actual loading, and found that its original design calculations are correct.
"We've confirmed that ordinary flight loads are exactly as predicted," the specialist said, and added that the components' design would remain "completely unchanged". But the airframer said it was changing the build process, to ensure that wing assembly does not generate unforeseen stresses.
Rib feet are L-shaped brackets, about 9in (23cm) tall, which connect the wing skin to composite rib structures. There are some 30-40 on each rib spanning the wing.
While the Qantas aircraft sustained extensive wing damage during the engine failure, engineers carried out an intensive inspection to establish whether there was evidence of damage which could not be attributed to the event.
This inspection revealed faint hairline cracks in the area where the rib foot is attached to the wing skin, running from the bolt-hole to the edge of the foot. He said a "few" of these feet were affected, located about halfway along the span of the wing.
The Qantas aircraft is one of the early airframes, MSN14, and the finding prompted precautionary checks on other initial-production A380s.
Nine aircraft have been inspected. Checks on another A380, during a 2C maintenance visit earlier this month, found cracks on a rib foot, in a different position. An immediate remedial solution involves replacing the affected rib feet and dropping a new section into its place.
While Airbus insists that the cracks are "nothing of concern", and would only need to be addressed over a period of years rather than urgently, it expects EASA to release an airworthiness directive instructing operators to carry out inspections - although the precise extent of these has yet to be disclosed.
"In the long term it would have to be fixed, but in the short term it's not a problem," the specialist pointed out.
Airbus said it is confident that the crack problems, originally only noticed as a consequence of the Qantas repair, would easily have been detected during a later heavy check, even if it had not been identified during earlier routine maintenance.
I wonder how long it would have taken Airbus to find out about the cracking had the uncontained engine failure not happened.
They would probably have figured it out about the time the uncontained wing-skin failure occurred.
Or when the Unscheduled Landing, Resulting In Collision With Terrain happened.
A problem in the manufacturing process...
I’m reminded of a problem the soviets had with
I believe the Stormovic attack aircraft, the wings
were falling off so they called in one of the top
designers who was languishing in the gulag he watched
the process and told them what the problem was.
The main spar was not lining up with the wing root
so the workers were taking a sledge hammer and just
driving the bolts home, thereby putting stress on the
spar which then failed in use. They fixed the alignment
and didn’t have any more problems and then the expert
went back to the gulag...
“The cracks were originally discovered in the rib feet...”
Ribs with feet. There’s your problem right there...
Kinda like bringing home the mistress and telling your spousal unit that it is “no cause for concern.”
The Gingrich effect ?
Twice during the 1950's, design defects caused serious crashes, the first with the fuselage cracking due to a poor window design on the de Havilland Comet I (that's why modern airliners have rounded windows) and second with the uncontrolled whirling of the outer propellers on the Lockheed L-188 Electra, which caused a vibration that literally ripped off wings from the plane. Today, thanks to highly-advanced supercomputer design, airplane structures are vastly safer, and structural defects are more easily found and corrected.
“Or when the Unscheduled Landing, Resulting In Collision With Terrain happened.”
Good one! Like ending the flight at a different kind of “terminal”?
If it’s not Boeing...I’m not going!
" Hey! It's all ball bearings nowadays. Now you prepare that Fetzer valve with some 3-in-1 oil and some gauze pads. And I'm gonna need 'bout ten quarts of anti-freeze, preferably Prestone. No, no make that Quaker State."
A couple of A380s have hit other planes of objects. Was this aircraft involved???
“Nothing to be concerned about - The trouble is leaving here fine.”
Now if they will fix the bleed air system that is contaminating the cabins with toxic TCP fumes I’ll think about flying again.
Think it’s not serious...google aerotoxic syndrom and do some research. The video “Angel Without Wings” is a good starting point.
Chinese people love eatin’ ‘em!
So we have TWO new rules: Don’t go putting a lot of rudder. And:Don’t uh...manufacture the plane.
You just unintentionally described the McDonalds McRib Sandwich.
"Longer-term issues" being a euphamism for "wings falling off".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.