Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: L,TOWM
Why? If the CDS are valid, they will compensate the bond holder %100. Not agreeing to a haircut is the obvious choice for the holders of CDS if they could be certain that the issuers of the CDS have sufficient capital to make the payments. That is the question that is preventing an agreement.
3 posted on 01/21/2012 9:28:20 AM PST by The Old Commander (Where is Madam dufarge when we need her?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Old Commander

And the other side of the CDS? The writers of the swap and those that are on the hook for repayment? And the effect that the default would have on the on the public holders of Greek debt?

We saw what happened to the financial system when a lot swaps were invoked in 2008. So, who gets to be AIG, Bear Stearns, and Lehman this time around? And can we deal with another shock to the system 3.5 years away from the last event?

TOC, your comment illustrates perfectly the myopia that I spoke of — yes, for the CDS purchasers, forcing a default is the “best” option for them. But the wider effect would be akin to the company that dumps toxic waste into the closest body of water, without thinking about the fact that the town the company is based in drinks that water; including all of the company employees and their families, from the CEO to the janitor. Every dollar of par recovered by a CDS purchaser has to be covered by the CDS writer. There is still no such thing as a free lunch in economics.

Short term and micro self-interest smart, long term and macro self-interest stupid.


4 posted on 01/21/2012 10:07:24 AM PST by L,TOWM (Once you see that it is all Kabuki Theater, you are free to quit wasting your time on politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson