CNN's John King Sends a Message

Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | January 20, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

[WilliamofCarmichael]

I am listening to Rush. My opinion is

First, I want to thank all the networks and cable TV for helping me validate my conclusion that they are mostly Obama's servile, complaisant, undistinguished media (SCUM).

Thank you, employees of Obama SCUM!

If only they would admit that they are not objective then they would be NO SCUM; and there'd be no criticism from me; because like conservative talk radio is they'd be honest about their bias. What a concept! Until then they are scum.

[MeganC]

Rush is right. Again. When the leftists and the media attack you it is abject surrender to apologize or to try to mollify them. What you do is exactly what Gingrich did last night and what Dick Cheney has done in the past and that is to hit the bastards back as hard as you can.

If you apologize they smell blood and they come back for more. You watch now, this issue with Newt will be forgotten in the media by Sunday night because they know they won’t get anywhere with it. And they’ll also mind themselves around Newt as they go forward knowing that he’ll turn pitbull on them if he’s provoked.

Way to go, Newt!

[mrsmel]

Rush said “they are shameless” so your answer as to when they’ll admit their bias is “never” because it would undermine their mission to propogandise and help indoctrinate and/or stupify America.

[ripley]

“Harder to attract decent people to run for public office...”

Rather, harder to attract decent non-progressive people to run for public office. (Make that non-communists to run for public office.)

[Kaslin]

YouTube

Newt Destroys John King, Media Over Ex-Wife Question To Thunderous Standing Ovation

[mongo141]

Pi$$ on the Communist News Network in general and John King in particular Lame Street Media serves only themselves and their master in the White Hut!

[bigbob]

I had to miss Rush today so thanks for the transcript.

Who gives a crap about the MSM, or would ever waste time trying to convert them?

The question will be, how many people who’ve heard this exchange now think more highly of Newt because he didn’t take King’s crap and gave it right back to him.

We shall soon see.

[PLD]

KING: It is an issue in the debate. Some of the other candidates are talking about it; voters are talking about it in this state. It was my judgment, my decision, and mine alone. If we're gonna deal with it, let's deal with it up front; let's not try to sneak it into the middle of the debate somewhere and people at home either agree with that or disagree with that. You —

Okay now it is dealt with time to move on..I loved the look on this CNN goons face when Newt gave his answer..

[arrdon]

I guess it’s safe to say that Dianne and Georges’ premature ejaculation somewhat fizzled. Be intereting to see what their next BS storm looks like....

[bigbob]

Notice too, that after the first time at :53 where King looks like he just swallowed a pickle, CNN keeps the camera on the crowd during the ovations and applause. As it should be, since the audience was by then the story, but I don’t think we need the body language maven to tell us who was in charge and who got schooled in that exchange.

[deep trout]

My gift to King, Chrissy Mathews, Schultz, all of them is to never watch their shows or the ABC, NBC, CBS channels they
are on ever. Galt their market.
The only time I watch CBS, CNN,MSNBC,whatever is if, and only if there is
a college or pro football game I decide I want to see.

[Parley Baer]

John King will get rave reviews from his cohorts in the msm but in fly over country Newt won big time. People are wanting someone who has a spine and will stand up to the MSM. GO NEWT GO!

[sanjuanbob]

They could be seriously concerned with a Gingrich victory in SC as it could gather steam and offer some serious competition to their leader. This isn’t the way it was supposed to play out. (so far). I always knew the BS line that they were most afraid of Romney meant that it was someone else....GO NEWT!

[cricket]

So these things are so critical for voters to know. . .and so, just where was ABC when John Edwards was playing 'husband' and Father. . .to Rielle and baby? They know; they sat on it; just as they 'sat' on Monica so as to not damage Clinton. And a host of other Dems ignored. Absent as well; any effort to throw light on the shadow side of Obama. .

Duty only calls; when a Repub is 'on the line'.

I hope someone begs the question of John. . .and all at ABC and their ad nauseum, clones. "Why Newt?" and not all the others; past and present DemRATS.

[America always]

I think perhaps it was a failed attempt to try and drive a wedge between the candidates and start a sort of sanctimonious feeding frenzy. In my observation liberals believe that conservatives are self-righteous, sanctimonious hypocrites. I think they were hoping the other candidates would turn on Newt and beat him over the head with the bible. Fortunately liberals fail to understand true Christianity also and their transparent attempt failed.

[oh8eleven]

I've had a long relationship with the Speaker. We don't always get along.
Why not? You're supposed to be a reporter - i.e. objective. Feckin' commies.

[Steely Tom]

But you can't beat 'em. They're not gonna be shamed. They're not going to be shamed into stopping the coverage of conservatives as they do it. It's going to continue. No matter what kind of shame you think they suffer in a contest like that -- no matter how much money they lose, no matter how many of them get fired, no matter how many magazines or TV stations or newspapers get shut down -- they are not gonna change. They are hard-core, leftist radicals right out of the White House.

For any conservative politician to believe they can "get the media to like them" or "get the media to hear them out and treat them fairly" is exactly like Neville Chamberlain thinking he could get Adolph Hitler to be reasonable by giving him Czechoslovakia. Hitler and his people were laughing at Chamberlain while they were making a fool out of him in front of the entire world and the court of human history.

Hitler had no desire to "be reasonable," and even as that fact became obvious to anyone with a brain, Chamberlain refused to see it and refused to adjust his approach to dealing with Hitler. Hitler had no desire to live in peace with his neighbors. Hitler was planning to conquer the world.

Liberalism, and the Main Stream Media which is its slave and mouthpiece, is no different. Politicians on our side who decline to see this are living in a dream world.

[Rudder]

Again, we learn the MSM is in bed with Obama.

Like Jim Nabors is wont to say, "Surprise, surprise!"