The idea that the owner of an item should be held liable for actions taken after the item was stolen from them is repugnant to the very idea of property rights and the rule of law.
1 posted on
01/16/2012 5:10:01 AM PST by
marktwain
To: marktwain
And why exactly hasn’t this Law Firm been tagged for “Abuse of Process”?? Start filing complaints with the State Bar Association, not that they will do anything, but if enough Lawyers file “Abuse of Process” Claims they will act on it. They should also be required to pay Attorney Fees in cases like this.
2 posted on
01/16/2012 5:22:46 AM PST by
eyeamok
To: marktwain
The Brady Center should take heart as Obama is a busy little beaver on their behalf working ‘under the radar’.
3 posted on
01/16/2012 5:36:16 AM PST by
JPG
(Matters at which the foolish laugh and at whose consequences the prudent weep.)
To: marktwain
As soon as the scumbags at the brady bunch start paying everybody’s legal fees and court costs they’ll quit with the frivolous crap.
4 posted on
01/16/2012 5:39:34 AM PST by
Scotsman will be Free
(11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
To: marktwain
All this nonsense is probably why gun prices are through the roof. I’m looking to buy a glock 19 gen4 and when all is said and done, it will cost 600+. I’ve owned working cars for less.
5 posted on
01/16/2012 5:45:05 AM PST by
LevinFan
To: marktwain
So why can’t they sue Brady’s minions for damages and attorney’s fees?
To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; SLB; ...
8 posted on
01/16/2012 6:03:20 AM PST by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
To: marktwain
The idea that the owner of an item should be held liable for actions taken after the item was stolen from them is repugnant to the very idea of property rights and the rule of law. Yep - until they consider holding Craftsmand accountable every time someone stabs another with a screwdriver, or to bring suit against God for when someone gets stoned to death, they need to lay off legitimate businesses for the crimes others commit.
9 posted on
01/16/2012 6:12:16 AM PST by
trebb
("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
To: marktwain
since there was an appeal, why is there no info about an award of attorney fees?
Perhaps Brady Campaign should be forced to post attorney fees bonds in the future.
Even have their lawyers sanctioned.
13 posted on
01/16/2012 7:08:48 AM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: marktwain
Under the ruling by SCOTUS in McDonald v. Chicago 2010, anti gun groups are now legally “Hate Organizations” as their goals are to infringe on the Civil Rights of a particular group of society, namely gun owners.
They need to be branded as such and justifiably demonized.
14 posted on
01/16/2012 7:47:25 AM PST by
BCR #226
(02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
To: marktwain
Back to square one, scumbags.
18 posted on
01/17/2012 11:11:59 AM PST by
GunRunner
(***Not associated with any criminal actions by the ATF***)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
