Is Ron Paul just words on a screen, not a real person? How about the sources you trust. Are they not just words on a screen?
You say you cannot get a read on his motivation because you have no idea what his thought process is. "The American Journal of Political Science found Ron Paul scored the most conservative of all 3,320 members of Congress from 1937 to 2002." Those are just words on a screen, but somehow Ron Paul has our Country's downfall as a goal. Somehow he would substantively alter the meaning and intent of our Constitution as we practice it within our borders and exercise our Constitutional prerogatives in the world.
If you can provide substantive facts pointing to Ron Paul as a tool of Communists, Socialists, and others who are opposed to the ideals of our founding fathers, by all means, I'll read. So far all I see is a concurrence of logistics and a huge disparity in principle.
Meanwhile my inclination is to believe lemmings and parrots do not by default have our country's best interests at heart. Why should I not consider you a hybrid?
A real person is someone I know, who I can vouch for. So no, Ron Paul wouldn't qualify. His views are facades on a sound stage. There's absolutely nothing behind them.