Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/12/2012 2:00:51 PM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee; little jeremiah

Ping!


2 posted on 01/12/2012 2:01:45 PM PST by NYer ("Be kind to every person you meet. For every person is fighting a great battle." St. Ephraim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
Legalizing a fiction still doesn't make it real.
3 posted on 01/12/2012 2:03:13 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
The two Republican senators who are now supporting gay marriage — Steve Litzow of Mercer Island and Cheryl Pflug of Maple Valley — said the issue was a matter of equality.

A religious ceremony is now a human right because those who marry are generous enough to involve the government when they marry?

And again, another perfect example of why Republican doesn't always mean conservative.

5 posted on 01/12/2012 2:08:06 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Part of me was honestly surprised the vote looks to be so close. It’s easy to forget that Washington state is (politically speaking) more than just Seattle and the rest of the I-5 corridor.


7 posted on 01/12/2012 2:20:20 PM PST by DemforBush (May I have 10,000 marbles, please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
Presenting marriage as a human 'right' is how the homos get 'gay marriage' made law. There is no 'right' to marry, it is a religious and social act that is done voluntary. That the state has some interest in marriage (children, property) and so can declare marriage a law with accompanying rules and regulations inherent in a law is unfortunate because now the homos can cite 'inequality under the law' and make the argument that to disallow same-sex 'marriage' is, all together now, 'discrimination!'. The all-too-common PC reaction of legislators to cries of 'discrimination!' is to 'fix it'. In this case by calling two homosexuals that want to mock marriage by pretending to be the same as a normal male-female couple, 'equal' and thus, by law, deem their coupling a 'marriage'. It is not - and pretending that because 'the law' recognizes it this transform a perversity into something not only legal but somehow socially equal to normal male-female marriage is a palpable lie. We are only fooled by this sham if we chose to be fooled.
8 posted on 01/12/2012 2:33:03 PM PST by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
Vote count is 22-18 but there are 49 lawmakers.

My suspicion is that those not volunteering their position are against gay marriage...though I have no solid proof.

Prayers up that Washington will do the right thing in the end.

9 posted on 01/12/2012 2:45:21 PM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AFA-Michigan; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Abathar; Absolutely Nobama; ...
Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

Fervently hoping it does not pass. When the actual VOTERS get to vote, they have always said "NO!"

12 posted on 01/12/2012 4:00:04 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

So-called “Gay marriage” will not be within reach in Wash. (State) Legislature:

The governor and the legislature will be neutered by “We, the people”:

By Lornet Turnbull, Seattle Times staff reporter (1/9/12):

“As the Legislature prepares to take up a bill legalizing same-sex marriage, a gay-marriage opponent on Monday filed an initiative in an attempt to ensure the issue is brought before voters in November, should lawmakers approve it.

The filing by Everett attorney Stephen Pidgeon comes a week after Gov. Chris Gregoire said she would propose same-sex marriage legislation for Washington state.

The proposed initiative, not yet numbered, would reaffirm the state’s Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as between “a male” and “a female.” The initiative seeks to slightly tweak the statute’s language, changing it to “one man” and “one woman.””


13 posted on 01/12/2012 8:03:18 PM PST by redfog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson