Ping!
A religious ceremony is now a human right because those who marry are generous enough to involve the government when they marry?
And again, another perfect example of why Republican doesn't always mean conservative.
Part of me was honestly surprised the vote looks to be so close. It’s easy to forget that Washington state is (politically speaking) more than just Seattle and the rest of the I-5 corridor.
My suspicion is that those not volunteering their position are against gay marriage...though I have no solid proof.
Prayers up that Washington will do the right thing in the end.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Fervently hoping it does not pass. When the actual VOTERS get to vote, they have always said "NO!"
So-called “Gay marriage” will not be within reach in Wash. (State) Legislature:
The governor and the legislature will be neutered by “We, the people”:
By Lornet Turnbull, Seattle Times staff reporter (1/9/12):
“As the Legislature prepares to take up a bill legalizing same-sex marriage, a gay-marriage opponent on Monday filed an initiative in an attempt to ensure the issue is brought before voters in November, should lawmakers approve it.
The filing by Everett attorney Stephen Pidgeon comes a week after Gov. Chris Gregoire said she would propose same-sex marriage legislation for Washington state.
The proposed initiative, not yet numbered, would reaffirm the state’s Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as between “a male” and “a female.” The initiative seeks to slightly tweak the statute’s language, changing it to “one man” and “one woman.””