[ravager]

Really? So you are saying a better legal system would have made the difference in this leopard attack incident? Explain to me that part, because to me the author of this piece of blog is a retard.

[marktwain]

I believe that the author is saying that if India did not have strict gun control, access to defensive firearms would be easier and more common.

If you do not define “gun control” as the legal controls on firearms, what do you define it as?

Are you suggesting that India’s legal restrictions on the possession, sale, and use of firearms have no effect on most of the population?