No pictures please.
1 posted on
01/11/2012 9:40:48 AM PST by
presidio9
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: presidio9
That’s certainly an unbiased and balanced article...
2 posted on
01/11/2012 9:43:35 AM PST by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: presidio9
Rachel Maddow, beacon of reason LOL! Awww, yer killin' me!
Thanks for the laugh today. I needed that.
3 posted on
01/11/2012 9:43:57 AM PST by
backwoods-engineer
(Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
To: presidio9
New York Daily News-Obama playing the race card in defense of Madcow.
4 posted on
01/11/2012 9:44:31 AM PST by
Old Sarge
(RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
To: presidio9
So this Crouch guy just tried to tie Roger Ailes and Fox News to D.W. Griffith and 1850s plantation owners. And people wonder why we call the left “moonbats?”
}:-)4
5 posted on
01/11/2012 9:46:19 AM PST by
Moose4
("Oderint dum metuant" -- "Let them hate, as long as they fear." (Lucius Accius, c. 130 BC))
To: presidio9
6 posted on
01/11/2012 9:47:13 AM PST by
Mr. K
(Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
To: presidio9
I like how he calls conservatives racists in one sentence, and then in the very next one, he refers to rednecks.
7 posted on
01/11/2012 9:47:27 AM PST by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: presidio9
Correction; That would be “Bacon of Reason”.. as in PIG
8 posted on
01/11/2012 9:48:18 AM PST by
Track9
(There IS revolution brewing..)
To: presidio9
Ideology is not a bad word. Basing your policies on an ideology is a good thing. If you don't you just get blown around in the wind.
irrational things for the sake of pure ideology.
9 posted on
01/11/2012 9:48:32 AM PST by
DManA
To: presidio9
Talk about run-away delusions. This writer is clearly on opium or worse.
To: presidio9
Stanley Crouch and Rachel Maddow, both reside in a bizzaro world, where facts are lies and lies are facts, and the voice of reason is the insanity which underlies their ideology.
11 posted on
01/11/2012 9:51:00 AM PST by
adorno
(<)
To: presidio9
You forgot the barf alert, slthough upon reflection, the title itself is a strong emetic
12 posted on
01/11/2012 9:51:33 AM PST by
from occupied ga
(your own government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: presidio9
No pictures please. New policy?
13 posted on
01/11/2012 9:52:19 AM PST by
Iron Munro
("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
To: presidio9; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; ...
RE :”
Yet Rachel Maddow, for one, is remarkable when it comes to proving in high quality intellectual detail how often the elephants do and say irrational things for the sake of pure ideology. Her proof that President Ronald Reagan did things contrary to what he supposedly believed is perfectly executed with hard facts — such as the fact of Reagan raising taxes 11 times. “
Maddow still pushes her economic theory that welfare recipients are the nations job creators as fact ('consumer's demand is the engine of job growth') even after the Obama/Pelosi stimulus failed to create jobs or a recovery. In fact she rarely mentions the Obama/Pelosi stimulus that was hawking nightly on her show in early 2009 as the sure cure to our employment problem/.
14 posted on
01/11/2012 9:52:33 AM PST by
sickoflibs
(You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
To: presidio9
Stanley Crouch is calling other people
RACIST???
15 posted on
01/11/2012 9:54:36 AM PST by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: presidio9
Rachel Maddow, he is FAR from being a beacon of reason or ANYTHING of reason for all that matters.
16 posted on
01/11/2012 9:55:13 AM PST by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: presidio9
I should say that Maddow’s interest in American women would be deepenedRachel Man-now's interest in women needs no deepening.
17 posted on
01/11/2012 9:56:00 AM PST by
GSWarrior
(Businessmen are more trustworthy than politicians, professors and preachers.)
To: presidio9
< Best Bevis and Butthead voice ...>
"Rachael Maddow" and "intellectual" used in the same sentence. he he ... he he ... he he ...
18 posted on
01/11/2012 9:56:10 AM PST by
dartuser
("If you are ... what you were ... then you're not.")
To: presidio9
A rare example of a title that needs no “Barf Alert” because the title is a barfer in and of itself.
19 posted on
01/11/2012 10:00:25 AM PST by
Cyber Liberty
("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
To: presidio9
Why do I never see anyone counter this myth of Reagan the tax raiser? If someone lowers the rate from 70 to 28%, and then increases it a couple percent, are they a tax cutter or a tax raiser? Also did those increases not coincide with a commitment to real spending cuts? Where are Obama’s cuts? He refuses.
Our side refuses to stay on the offensive.
20 posted on
01/11/2012 10:00:44 AM PST by
ilgipper
(Everything you get from the government was taken from someone else)
To: presidio9
the author tried so hard to keep the bias out, but by the end of the article, she is frothing at the mouth..
22 posted on
01/11/2012 10:03:37 AM PST by
cardinal4
(Bolton/Arpaio 2012 "Kick the UN across the border!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson