Skip to comments.
Monterey Biologist Accused of Feeding Whale (Faces 20 Years in Federal Prison, Large Fines)
AP ^
| Monday, January 9, 2012
| JASON DEAREN
Posted on 01/09/2012 5:19:17 PM PST by DogByte6RER
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: rlmorel
You’ve nailed it...Exactly what leftards do!
Hoist by their own petards!
21
posted on
01/09/2012 5:58:39 PM PST
by
elteemike
(Light travels faster than sound...That's why so many people appear bright until you hear them speak!)
To: DogByte6RER
Anybody know the rationale behind the “don’t feed the whales” law, and why it’s so harsh? Is it supposed to keep sightseeing trips under control and keep the animals from becoming domesticated, or is there some poaching angle?
22
posted on
01/09/2012 5:59:50 PM PST
by
Minn
(Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
To: All
23
posted on
01/09/2012 6:01:57 PM PST
by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: DogByte6RER
If she’s a liberal, I hope she gets the maximum sentence. I have ZERO sympathy for liberals who suffer from other liberal’s actions. Of course, she will likely find a way to blame it on Bush.
24
posted on
01/09/2012 6:03:01 PM PST
by
sand88
To: rlmorel
Exactly what leftards do! You’ve nailed it...
Hoist by their own petards!
25
posted on
01/09/2012 6:03:58 PM PST
by
elteemike
(Light travels faster than sound...That's why so many people appear bright until you hear them speak!)
To: rlmorel
Exactly what leftards do! You’ve nailed it...
Hoist by their own petards!
26
posted on
01/09/2012 6:04:12 PM PST
by
elteemike
(Light travels faster than sound...That's why so many people appear bright until you hear them speak!)
To: DogByte6RER
Seems to me she has been baiting and training them for the purpose of making money. And since they are wild animals that is illegal. And also dangerous.
27
posted on
01/09/2012 6:05:49 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
To: rlmorel
Exactly what leftards do!
You’ve nailed it!
Hoist by their own petards!
28
posted on
01/09/2012 6:07:16 PM PST
by
elteemike
(Light travels faster than sound...That's why so many people appear bright until you hear them speak!)
To: DogByte6RER
Feed the whales so the federal bureaucracy can feed itself
29
posted on
01/09/2012 6:08:43 PM PST
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: 2111USMC
Do you think those signs in national parks, that say do not feed the animals, are put up for decoration.
30
posted on
01/09/2012 6:10:11 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
To: org.whodat
Good grief.
I figured that my post was goofy enough that a “/s” wasn’t required.
31
posted on
01/09/2012 6:18:45 PM PST
by
2111USMC
(Not a hard man to track. Leaves dead men wherever he goes.)
To: elteemike
Fail....... twentyfive posts and not to the bottom yet
A jealous but better politically connected biologist wanted to eliminate the scientific and whale watching competition and snitched to the powers that be. The marine scientist Nancy Black has been put out of business and out of grant funding. It is simple as that.
The battle for grants gets bloody in California
32
posted on
01/09/2012 6:25:29 PM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
To: 2111USMC
33
posted on
01/09/2012 6:26:14 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
To: DogByte6RER
We need new laws, a new agency, and a cabinet level czar to regulate whale watchers.
Our Constitution demands it.
34
posted on
01/09/2012 6:33:09 PM PST
by
HereInTheHeartland
(I love how the FR spellchecker doesn't recognize the word "Obama")
To: bigdaddy45
35
posted on
01/09/2012 7:25:14 PM PST
by
Waverunner
(I'd like to welcome our new overlords, say hello to my little friend)
To: DogByte6RER
Nothing wrong with whale feeding. Moochelle’s personal chef does it every day.
36
posted on
01/09/2012 7:29:52 PM PST
by
wbill
To: DogByte6RER
Obviously they were not aware of WHO she is. Those laws are for the lesser beings not for the self anointed ones.
37
posted on
01/09/2012 7:45:36 PM PST
by
RetiredTexasVet
(There's a pill for just about everything ... except stupid!)
To: RetiredTexasVet
I think evidence tampering is allowed for some ... they better check the list again.
38
posted on
01/09/2012 7:47:40 PM PST
by
RetiredTexasVet
(There's a pill for just about everything ... except stupid!)
To: wbill
Unless whales go “Moo”, I think the White House chef is safe.
39
posted on
01/09/2012 7:50:59 PM PST
by
RetiredTexasVet
(There's a pill for just about everything ... except stupid!)
To: elteemike
I have always thought that phrase “hoisted on their own petard” seemed fit the liberal condition most satisfactorily...
40
posted on
01/09/2012 8:04:26 PM PST
by
rlmorel
("A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." Winston Churchill)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
