New Hampshire; they like that Huntsman “ can’t we all just get along” approach. It won’t fly anywhere else.
What I don’t understand is why states like Iowa or NH get to go first, thus giving these freak-of-nature states the first say in who is the Republican candidate. They aren’t even reliably conservative. Wouldn’t it make more sense to let Red States go first, so that we don’t have a situation where a liberal who is hated by the vast majority of Republicans gets the nomination through pure money and staying power?
It’s a system that promotes mediocrity and decline. The only real Republican winners have been the ones who are the most conservative. Weaklings like McCain or Romney can’t beat a hard left Obama because they’re as vapid as Obama is. When truth is preached boldly, people are drawn to it.
New Hampshire: you’ve really got to wonder about a state that has Romney first, Paul second and Huntsman third. It completely inverses the correct order for a Conservative. These three should obviously be at the bottom.
Yes, and he is even worse than Romney, in my book. Maybe a little more substantive, if I had to grant him a positive.