Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Panetta: Iran Has Not Yet Decided to Make a Nuclear Bomb
Fox News ^ | Jan 8, 2012 | Staff

Posted on 01/08/2012 8:26:51 AM PST by bkopto

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: musicman; ex-Texan


61 posted on 01/08/2012 11:37:42 PM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is never 'free'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trebb

More like Lenin, Ivan, Nikita or Leonid. He’s a traitor pure and simple.


62 posted on 01/09/2012 6:28:19 AM PST by dools0007world
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
Panetta: Iran Has Not Yet Decided to Make a Nuclear Bomb

Of course not! They are waiting for the okay from Obama...

63 posted on 01/09/2012 6:49:00 AM PST by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola

64 posted on 01/09/2012 7:45:31 AM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
... and Leon thought the Japanese were going to drop care packages on Pearl Harbor when the Zeroes were spotted over head.

Leon needs to remember, the Iranians first target will be a blue state, city, or DC.

65 posted on 01/09/2012 7:49:21 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Panetta and Biden must share the same brain cell.


66 posted on 01/09/2012 10:11:29 AM PST by crosshairs (Liberalism is to truth, what east is to west.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
Panetta: Iran Has Not Yet Decided to Make a Nuclear Bomb

Fixed it.

67 posted on 01/09/2012 11:08:40 AM PST by Altariel (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn
However, if Iran detonated a nuclear device within the US and then announces that they had infiltrated 20 such weapons into the US across the US-Mexico border and hidden them in American cities to destroy those cities if the US did not give into Iran's demands there could be a big problem for the US and would probably keep us from launching a retaliatory strike against Iran.

The logistics of smuggling even one nuclear weapon into the US would make an infiltration mission extremely unreliable. There are also control problems – the mullahs are the ones who will want to press the button and they won’t easily trust a remote team with possession of their most expensive toys.

On the other hand, it would be relatively easy to move in a half-dozen commando teams and light arms across the border undetected. This essentially is happening now with the Mexican drug cartels. Once deployed into major cities, the Hezbollah teams could cause a lot of damage and confusion before they were mopped up.

A freighter crewed by Iranian guards might get a bomb into a major harbor and detonate it with greater chance of success. That is one bomb and one harbor gone. However, there would be no possible follow-on attack under such conditions, nor any chance of avoiding retaliation.

A more likely scenario is a mass-attack on Israel with 10-19 IRBMs and a reserve of missiles aimed at the Saudi Arabian oil fields to discourage retaliation. Israel would be obliterated if even half the missiles worked, and the US would be under direct pressure from our European “allies” to “avoid escalating the conflict”.

Under the current Administration, US forces might actually be ordered to fire on Israeli nuclear weapons sites to prevent the surviving IDF crews from using them.

The Mullahs may have convinced themselves that this could work. They probably do not have enough warheads or missiles yet to try.

It is clear from the reports of STUXNET , factory “work-accidents” and assassinations of Iranian scientists, that something more than harsh economic sanctions is already impeding progress toward the Iranian goals.

68 posted on 01/11/2012 1:31:16 PM PST by flamberge (What next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: M.T. Helmets
I simply don’t understand Panetta’s logic.

The logic is quite simple. These are soothing lies, presented to a gullible public in order to justify doing nothing - at least overtly.

It has been said, "Diplomacy is the are of saying "nice doggie", until you can find a big rock".

Of course, by pushing for military cutbacks,the Obama Administration is getting rid of the big rock as fast as they can.

A reasonable conclusion is that, Obama is on the side of American enemies - as are many of his backers.

69 posted on 01/11/2012 1:45:31 PM PST by flamberge (What next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson