Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Squatters in Texas Town Use Arcane Law to Claim Vacant Homes
Fox News ^ | January 5, 2012 | Maggie Kerkman

Posted on 01/05/2012 8:18:57 PM PST by SteelToe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: JRandomFreeper
But idle property with back taxes owed... that's fair game.

In Texas, who gets stuck with the tax liens? Everywhere I've ever lived it is the posessor, not the original owner. That decreases the inducement to adversely posess. A lot.

21 posted on 01/06/2012 10:39:57 AM PST by jboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

I also completely own my home. I religiously pay the taxes, too. Should I ever come home and find a squatter, well...let’s just say the ‘squatter’ wouldn’t be squatting any more.


22 posted on 01/06/2012 10:43:07 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
There are all sorts of thieves out there and you have to be vigilant.

In land law you are more than right. I was in land surveying for a decade and the scams we encountered ranged from downright silly (a dude who moved his fence onto his neighbor's lot a few inches a week...his neighbor had Polaroids of him doing it in broad daylight) to Machiavellian. A lot of the really old parcels in western Maryland have a non-contiguous "wood lot" included in the description. One county surveyor spent an entire career "forgetting" to include these wood lot parcels in the new description when the main parcels would sell, and then later quietly deeding them to himself. Because the old descriptins were handwritten in a script that almost no one could still read, no one caught him in his lifetime.

23 posted on 01/06/2012 10:51:38 AM PST by jboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
There are all sorts of thieves out there and you have to be vigilant.

In land law you are more than right. I was in land surveying for a decade and the scams we encountered ranged from downright silly (a dude who moved his fence onto his neighbor's lot a few inches a week...his neighbor had Polaroids of him doing it in broad daylight) to Machiavellian. A lot of the really old parcels in western Maryland have a non-contiguous "wood lot" included in the description. One county surveyor spent an entire career "forgetting" to include these wood lot parcels in the new description when the main parcels would sell, and then later quietly deeding them to himself. Because the old descriptins were handwritten in a script that almost no one could still read, no one caught him in his lifetime.

24 posted on 01/06/2012 10:51:38 AM PST by jboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jboot

Yep.

Our deeds go back to the 1880s. Since there was no access to our back 40 once the State highway went in, the *convention* was that we had an easement from “the center line across the contiguous parcel”. The owner before us was not farming and we don’t farm, either, although both rented occasionally to others. The description got left off the deed. The convention is no longer recognized. It is almost 50 years later. Therefore: we lost road access across the neighboring parcel into our back fields. This makes it impossible to sell off the back 40 unless we grant an easement through our our driveway or manage to buy one from the neighbor. It is only across a field, but it is one that can flood, so we would not only need to buy the right, but put in a culvert. I don’t know what it would take to buy an easement, today. The cost of even a simple road with a culvert is several thousand, today.

Did those landowners ever get their woodlots back or compensation?


25 posted on 01/06/2012 1:44:01 PM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Progov

Yep. Not that I would DO that of course, but...accidents DO happen.


26 posted on 01/07/2012 4:48:29 PM PST by rlmorel ("A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
No one was ever compensated. It wasn't "public" knowledge. I only found out because I was establishing chains of title and discovered some of the crooked transfers. I pressed the matter with a couple "old-timers" and one of them finally spilled the beans.

Around the same time I also uncovered a pot-hunting operation. A lot of money was changing hands, so when a couple of the "boys" found out I was onto them they had a "word" with me. I was young and just getting the family started, and decided to forget both matters.

Sorry to hear about your problem. I've seen folks successully sue the title company who truncated a description, but there is a statute of limitations (in MD it used to be 20 years).

27 posted on 01/09/2012 7:33:59 AM PST by jboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson