To: newheart
Thanks, so if the tea party stands for fiscal conservatism why would you not put Paul in that group? Not trying to be argumentative, we are on the same side, but why diss those that support Paul (like me) if you don’t have to?
12 posted on
01/05/2012 4:22:25 PM PST by
jpsb
To: jpsb
I thought that was where you were going. You will notice that I said "aside from
some Paul supporters." I clearly recognize that there are many within the Paul camp who have a strong fiscal conservative bent. The ones that worry me are the guys like David Duke and those who seem to think that the solution to our foreign policy problems is to abandon Israel.
So, no disrespect toward you intended. In fact, I figure there are a lot of Romney supporters who line up with tea party values but who have bought into the media mantra that he is the only one who is electable.
14 posted on
01/05/2012 4:27:39 PM PST by
newheart
(When does policy become treason?)
To: jpsb
A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Willard.
And Ron Paul is not a true conservative. He’s at best, 1/3 conservative, 2/3 VERY LIBERAL.
16 posted on
01/05/2012 4:36:32 PM PST by
CainConservative
( Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Bolton, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson