This may also be yet another teachable moment in the difference between "citizenship" and being a "natural-born citizen".
This case seems to set aside place of birth or authentication of birth records, and concentrates on the real issue of "natural-born" citizen as was the intent in the Constitution, bolstered by case law, and commonly defined in civil law. The baby-daddy ain't no US citizen, so the baby ain't no NBC.
So the pejorative of "Birther" may need to be morphed into "Constitutioner". Either way, if this case gets traction, it may play in to the violence that has been threatened in the passed.
I have long objected to the occurrence of legal decisions based more on the formalities of procedure and technicality than on the actual pursuit of justice. It should not matter who is your lawyer, but instead the sole deciding factor in any court decision ought to be the principle of truth and justice.