Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JediJones

You miss the very simple point of the post. Reagan knew liberal republicans when he created the 11th commandment and Romney would have been middle of the pack to right given Ford/Rockefeller types. So you can say that it’s OK for Newt to ignore it if that’s your wish - but don’t pretend that it respects Reagan’s intent - he would have handled Romney without personal attack - let alone going anti-business, anti-capitalist.

As far as learning more about Newt, I suppose I could. I have seen every debate this year. I’ve watched Newt videos in the past - both political and historical. I’ve been reading Gingrich books on/off since I read his intro to Future Shock. I’ve also seen/heard the various TV and talk-radio interview. The opinions were not exhaustively researched but they were also not without thought. Newt has good policy and the occasional odd policy. In regards to Newt getting touch with Romney - he comes off whiney and worse. To quote Stepbrothers, when he goes anti-capitalist, anti-rich, anti-business to “get” Romney - Newt - “You’re Just Coming Off Stupid”


108 posted on 01/05/2012 12:17:45 AM PST by sick1 (Don't fear the freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: sick1

You are correct look at he field in the 1980 primary

GW Bush
R. Dole
j Anderson
P Crane

All of these are either left of or similar to Romney today and Reagan never acted like Gingrich he took them on regarding issues and blew them out of the water.


118 posted on 01/05/2012 9:16:38 AM PST by lakewood conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson