Skip to comments.
Michelle Obama’s Pricey Vacation Wardrobe
ABC News ^
Posted on 12/29/2011 9:43:17 AM PST by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Sub-Driver
She’s just being “practical” with her priorities
21
posted on
12/29/2011 10:30:36 AM PST
by
fml
To: Sub-Driver
I’m still trying to figure out what a “bag waist” is on a skirt????
22
posted on
12/29/2011 10:38:07 AM PST
by
goodnesswins
(Happy New Year.....may it be better than the last!)
To: ZULU
How about an emerging third-world banana republic?
23
posted on
12/29/2011 10:41:03 AM PST
by
luvbach1
(Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
To: luvbach1
I like that! (The phrase)
24
posted on
12/29/2011 10:43:54 AM PST
by
ZULU
(LIBERATE HAGIA SOPHIA!!!!!)
To: fml
Michelle, the Scarlet O'Hara of 1600 Pennsylvania, has no taste in clothes. Therefore, it is incumbent as a good Muslim, husband. and father that Barry encase her (and the kids) in burqas. It will save money and certainly remove a fashion eyesore from a blighted landscape.
To: Izzy Dunne
Lord but I miss her grace and elegance.
A class act.
26
posted on
12/29/2011 10:57:24 AM PST
by
Right Cal Gal
(Ronald Reagan: "our liberal friends....know so much that isn't so...")
To: hoosiermama; Clock King
Grateful they’re Getty images that can’t be posted here, but I had to look.
The woman is a fashion disaster.
27
posted on
12/29/2011 10:57:55 AM PST
by
onyx
(PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC:DONATE MONTHLY! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
To: Sub-Driver
It's good to be Queen.
To: dainbramaged
If it was any republican first lady the media hacks would be screaming from the rooftopsRemember the s##tstorm they created about Sarah Palin's wardrobe during the 08 campaign?
29
posted on
12/29/2011 11:02:53 AM PST
by
Marathoner
("Government is not reason. Government is not eloquence. It is force." George Washington)
To: Marathoner
I thought she shopped at Target. Must be some really special super Target with those labels and prices!
30
posted on
12/29/2011 11:12:46 AM PST
by
samanella
((I may not always be right, but I will never be left))
To: ZULU
[This couple comports themselves like the dictators of a third world banana republic “emerging nation”, not the elected heads of a western democracy]
I read: This couple COMPOSTS themselves like the dictators of a third world banana republic
I like my version even better! Ha!
31
posted on
12/29/2011 11:20:06 AM PST
by
FastCoyote
(I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
To: Sub-Driver
Some see the first ladys penchant for expensive labels at odds with her reputation as a bargain shopper My ass.
32
posted on
12/29/2011 11:25:45 AM PST
by
Old Sarge
(RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
To: MasterGunner01
The war left Scarlet O’Hara penniless. She worked her tail off to survive during the war, became a very hard-working, ruthless lumber baron after the war. No way you should compare the filthy, shiftless parasitic grifter in the white hut to Scarlet.
To: ProtectOurFreedom
love the arms.
I also recall all the HELLLLLLL raised by the MSM over Nancy Reagan purchasing new china for the WH.
And the MSM STILL raises Hellllll about Sarah Palin’s $100K wardrobe!
34
posted on
12/29/2011 11:28:27 AM PST
by
a real Sheila
(Taylor/Fife 2012)
To: Old Sarge
I would like to know how many times she went to Hawaii before Obama got elected. With her size, coach class would have been very uncomfortable for that length of trip.
35
posted on
12/29/2011 11:40:43 AM PST
by
RummyChick
(It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
To: Wiser now
She has no idea how to dress or get value for her dollar. You made my point. It doesn't matter how much she spends for so-called designer garments - she still looks like a sloppy, stuffed pillow case. And furthermore, might it not be taxpayer dollars?
36
posted on
12/29/2011 11:43:40 AM PST
by
ArmyTeach
(Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain ... USS Iowa BB 61)
To: Sub-Driver
It just goes to show you that you cannot “affirmative action” class and good taste.
37
posted on
12/29/2011 11:53:25 AM PST
by
ab01
To: hoosiermama
38
posted on
12/29/2011 12:10:05 PM PST
by
quantim
(Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
To: RummyChick
With her size, coach class would have been very uncomfortable for that length of trip.Well, the real issue of course is the First Family's bloated personal spending habits. For her part, Michelle routinely spends corpulent sums on meals, clothing and various accoutrements that have made her the butt of many jokes.
And should it not carry considerable weight with the public that Michelle has repeatedly fed a ravenous appetite for conspicuous consumption, and in a manner that suggests that she takes a back seat to no one?
Perhaps we'll never get to the bottom of it all, but Michelle might do well to at least reflect upon the broad dimensions of the problem and at least make an effort to scale back all the booty. Otherwise, the public will never again be inclined to give her a wide berth.
39
posted on
12/29/2011 12:16:44 PM PST
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
Good point. Michelle would fit right in with Kim Jong-Un though.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson