To: dsc
"Back in my dayyou know, wooden ships and iron menthey wouldnt send a carrier in there because those waters are far too restricted. Of course, that was when Ronaldus Magnus was president. " I agree...too restrictive.
Also, I don't believe that much of the oil for the USA goes through this strait anymore.
We're doing this mainly for the rest of the (ungrateful) world.
15 posted on
12/29/2011 7:49:11 AM PST by
blam
To: blam
"I don't believe that much of the oil for the USA goes through this strait anymore." That is correct, but removal of oil coming through the Gulf reduces world supply, thus impacting price in the US even though direct shipments do not come from there.
Also I agree with others about operating the carrier in narrow quarters. Technology can be defeated by assymetrical tactics, and Iran appears more than willing to use them.
24 posted on
12/29/2011 8:13:44 AM PST by
buckalfa
(Confused and Bewildered With a Glass Half Empty)
To: blam
I don't believe that much of the oil for the USA goes through this strait anymore Our petroleum imports from the Persian Gulf remain around 2 million barrels per day or about 18% of our total imports. It had been less but has crept back up.
46 posted on
12/29/2011 8:59:44 AM PST by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: blam
"Also, I don't believe that much of the oil for the USA goes through this strait anymore." 17% of all oil, according to what I've read.
93 posted on
12/29/2011 10:40:42 AM PST by
ataDude
(Its like 1933, mixed with the Carter 70s, plus the books 1984 and Animal Farm, all at the same time.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson