Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/29/2011 7:34:00 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: blam
None of this would be necessary if we had been drilling for our own oil on our own land. But people like Barry and his Lib,enviro fools have seen to it that we could be put in a tough spot. Watch the oil market folks. The terrible part is the enviro nuts love all this crap especially if it sends the cost of crude skyrocketing to use a Barry coined term.
2 posted on 12/29/2011 7:37:02 AM PST by mk2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Big ol radar cross section but still awesome to look at. I never did tire of looking at ships and planes while in and still enjoy seeing them.


3 posted on 12/29/2011 7:37:20 AM PST by VaRepublican (I would propagate taglines but I don't know how. But bloggers do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I hope Obama knows what he is doing. It can’t be like his Drone moment. Can I have my Drone back. Pretty Please.


4 posted on 12/29/2011 7:39:03 AM PST by ncfool (The new USSA - United Socialist States of AmeriKa. Welcome to Obummers world or Obamaville USSA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I don’t think that’s very smart at all.

Back in my day—you know, wooden ships and iron men—they wouldn’t send a carrier in there because those waters are far too restricted. Of course, that was when Ronaldus Magnus was president.

I have an uneasy sense of impending disaster. Hope I’m just being silly.


5 posted on 12/29/2011 7:39:21 AM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

My nephew’s on the Stennis. Stay safe Kenny.


6 posted on 12/29/2011 7:41:41 AM PST by pgkdan ("Make what Americans buy, Buy what Americans make, and sell it to the world" Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Interesting that Iran doesn’t mention the Nuclear Subs that accompany all Carriers.


7 posted on 12/29/2011 7:42:58 AM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

SOH = rather limited maneuvering room for a US aircraft carrier and all the supporting defense forces to protect it... which used to include a second carrier group nearby

I remember the days when adults were in charge of strategic decisonmaking and the US the Navy would not take this risk for a FON show of force with an unstable dictator backed by the Russians and the Chinese

Let’s hope the Iranians play nice


10 posted on 12/29/2011 7:44:27 AM PST by silverleaf (common sense is not so common- voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

If El Presidente will just let the navy do what the navy does best, there will be a very short stare down in the Strait of Hormuz. Then maybe a little flyover of the presidential palace in Tehran by an F18 squadran.
Then things will get back to what is considered normal. But my guess is El Presidente will try to negotiate with Tehran and once again, we will come out on the short end.


11 posted on 12/29/2011 7:45:34 AM PST by Tupelo ( 2012 TEA PARTYER but no longer a Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

FWIW I don’t think Zero gets on the phone and tells the Navy to send a carrier into this body of water or that body of water.

I’m sure that the way it works is that the services and the Joint Chiefs prepare certain options and certain recommendations and the president may or may not sign off of them depending on their importance.

Point being that if the ship is in the SOH it’s because the Navy itself worked out a plan to do this - not because Zero thought it up on the golf course.


21 posted on 12/29/2011 7:59:41 AM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Gee when the Shiite hits the fan in the Gulf I hope it doesn’t interrupt Obama’s vacation...I suppose he could finish his hole of golf before delivering his capitulation speech.


32 posted on 12/29/2011 8:18:54 AM PST by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I’m just wondering if this is exactly what the Iranians want us to do. And whether it gives cover to Bammy to do it.


35 posted on 12/29/2011 8:21:56 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Back in 2002 the Pentagon created an wargame exercise like this, called Millenium Challenge. Playing the role of Ahmadinejad was a retired US Marine Colonel and Vietnam hero, Paul Van Riper. Van Riper was supposed to do things the normal way and get squashed. Instead, he decided to be creative. Here's how the UK paper The Guardian put it:

Van Riper had at his disposal a computer-generated flotilla of small boats and planes, many of them civilian, which he kept buzzing around the virtual Persian Gulf in circles as the game was about to get under way. As the US fleet entered the Gulf, Van Riper gave a signal - not in a radio transmission that might have been intercepted, but in a coded message broadcast from the minarets of mosques at the call to prayer. The seemingly harmless pleasure craft and propeller planes suddenly turned deadly, ramming into Blue boats and airfields along the Gulf in scores of al-Qaida-style suicide attacks. Meanwhile, Chinese Silkworm-type cruise missiles fired from some of the small boats sank the US fleet's only aircraft carrier and two marine helicopter carriers. The tactics were reminiscent of the al-Qaida attack on the USS Cole in Yemen two years ago, but the Blue fleet did not seem prepared. Sixteen ships were sunk altogether, along with thousands of marines. If it had really happened, it would have been the worst naval disaster since Pearl Harbor.

So after he routed his opponents, the Pentagon brass got together and decided the middle eastern dictator would never do that and declared a do-over. And this time, they rigged it so he had to do things their way. And of course, they routed him this time.

Will Ahmadinejad play by those rules or will he think outside the box?

39 posted on 12/29/2011 8:32:13 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The Associated Press reports Iran is playing up the sighting of the carrier and boasting of the strength of its navy in the region.So you feelin' frisky, Abdul? Go for it and see what happens next.
41 posted on 12/29/2011 8:37:02 AM PST by mikeus_maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

It’s funny how the wheel of history often turns on naval paradigm shifts. Think of the Monitor and the Merrimack.

Or more to the point, the Prince of Wales and the Repulse, sent out to disrupt the Japanese attack on Singapore.

I hope we are not about to learn a painful new lesson about the limits of sea power in 2011.


42 posted on 12/29/2011 8:44:28 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Forgive me from copying this from another thread, but I’m in a hurry to get off the computer. I think it’s worth mentioning again.

The mullahs running Iran’s Rev’y Guards could structure their standing orders to their thousands of mobile missile batteries so that they could not be recalled or overturned.

The Iranian leaders understand full well we would attack, disrupt or spoof their C&C, so they might have built a plan based upon sealed standing orders. “No matter what you hear on the radio after the war starts, you will open your sealed orders on day five, and obey them to your last breath, on pain of eternal damnation if you disobey them.”

Remember, the missile batteries are not under the control of prof. military, but fanatical rev. guards, spread over thousand of square miles of mountains, cliffs and ravines surrounding the straits.

If they are given sealed orders to remain in their hidden caves until day 95, eating Iranian MREs, they will do so with all the fervor of the Japs hiding on Pacific Islands into the 1950s, 60s and 70s. Then on day 95 (or any other day in their orders) they will come out and fire at any ships in range. Each battery can be given a different launch day. No orders from above will be needed, and no orders not to launch will be believed or obeyed. No recall possible.

Don’t discount this “doomsday” option. The mullahs are on record as trying to instigate a doomsday “return of the Mahdi” scenario.

Don’t assume rational Western thought processes on them, and don’t assume an Iranian war plan that can be recalled by the Iranian leadership due to Western pressure. Once begun, each missile crew might have to be dug out by troops on the ground.

Considering we were not even able to stop a single SCUD launch in Desert Storm, up to the last day of the war, I’d assume a large % of the Iranian mobile anti-ship missile batteries will be operational for months after the hostilities open.


49 posted on 12/29/2011 9:06:48 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
3 million gallons of onboard fuel for its aircraft

IOW, a floating bomb.

54 posted on 12/29/2011 9:22:02 AM PST by Jim Noble ("The Germans: At your feet, or at your throat" - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: magslinger; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; investigateworld; lowbuck; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

68 posted on 12/29/2011 9:40:06 AM PST by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Iran is beating its chest? What, did they turn vegetarian and give up meat?


74 posted on 12/29/2011 9:52:10 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Iran has numerous very quiet DE subs. Having a carrier in that little space is asking for disaster.
That and shore missile batteries would zero in on a carrier.

Station a carrier 100+ miles out in the Indian Ocean, land based assets in Kuwait, Southern Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan to cover the Northern Gulf.

Also, I believe the Persian Gulf is too shallow for Nuke subs.
While they can submerge, they can’t deep dive for evasive action..


77 posted on 12/29/2011 9:54:18 AM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

“Iran has announced it located a U.S. aircraft carrier moving into the Strait of Hormuz during Iranian wargame exercises.

The AFP reports Commodore Mahmoud Mousavi, spokesman for the exercises, says the carrier was spotted by an Iranian reconnaissance plane that took photos and video.”

Dont pat yourself on the back too hard.

We weren’t trying to hide it from you. We just want you to get a glimpse of a ship that can turn your entire navy into toothpicks.


82 posted on 12/29/2011 10:04:27 AM PST by VanDeKoik (1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson