Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Crichton

Out of those you mention, I’d go with Perry...
I’ve ruled out Willard and HuntsRINO. Even Newt had
some executive experience as Speaker.

I have met and spent time with Santorum when he was
my Senator. He is a decent guy. He couldn’t carry
PA in the end. Is he better than Zero? On many issues,
sure. Can he make the fundamental change needed? No one
knows. If he gets the nomination, I’ll vote for him.
Until then, I’m stuck with Newt (not liking that) or
Perry (hasn’t debated well and I disagree on some
issues, but agree on others).

Personally, I’m not convinced Rick has prepared for
the big seat...


23 posted on 12/27/2011 12:06:32 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (You know, 99.99999965% of the lawyers give all of them a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: aMorePerfectUnion
Santorum is a good man, and he can govern effectively if he will acknowledge his weakness in executive experience and put an experienced, wise executive in a close advisory position.

Mr. Obama had NO significant executive experience before Americans liberals placed him at the helm of this nation. “Community organizing” as a career is the art of teaching class envy and group extortion.

I'd rather have Rick Santorum learn “on-the-job” than have four more years of Mr. Obama.

49 posted on 12/27/2011 1:04:34 PM PST by July4 (Remember the price paid for your freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson