Clarification from the NRA. It was unclear from earlier articles, just how extensive the change would be. Eliminating the "sporting purposes" language, or doing away with GCA68, would be even better.
1 posted on
12/27/2011 6:56:41 AM PST by
marktwain
To: marktwain
“Sporting uses” is ridiculous language.
It reduces a serious matter to “fun and games”
2 posted on
12/27/2011 7:01:06 AM PST by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: marktwain
It seems that for any “Sporting Purposes Test” to be “Constitutionally Valid” they would have to include government representatives as a game species.
Just observing, not suggesting.
3 posted on
12/27/2011 7:44:18 AM PST by
Steamburg
(The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
To: marktwain
I defy any of these "sporting purposes" legiwankers to compete in the
sport of skeet against my son.
He uses his Mossberg 590 with dual pistol grips -- and shoots "from the hip:..."
Even with my 20 ga o/u. he is tough to beat!
6 posted on
12/27/2011 10:51:17 AM PST by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson