What’s needed is to find out which council members are pushing this and either have them recalled or pro-firearms members of the community run against these dolts in the next election.
Question from a foreigner. Are guns allowed inside banks in all right-to-carry States? I remember being in Arizona years and years ago and of course I was surprised to see citizens toting guns (I was also surprised to see a drive-in church). I had to deal with some people who had side arms on display and I flippantly said: “Hey that’s not fair, I want one too!” They pointed me to a nearby gunshop. But going to the bank, I saw that they had to leave their weapons outside. Or at least that’s what I remember.
BTW, I’m not against guns. I used to be until I thought about it. So it’s just pure curiosity.
Not even the police?
Consider, what is going to happen if the Council does something that gets someone so angry they are going to come after them. If the angry citizen is thinking clearly, they are not going to come after them in the meeting, in front of dozens of witnesses, having walked through parking lots and hallways with video surveillance. That's just asking to get caught. So in this case, having armed people about is a wash, doesn't matter.
If your angry, violent citizen is out of control, do you really want them to come to the meeting and find a bunch of unarmed ready-made victims (you and potentially other citizens)? No. In that case having armed, responsible citizens around will act as a powerful deterrent, and a force to bring any confrontation to a swift conclusion.
A better plan would simply be to act smart, and in the best interests of the citizenry and you won't get anyone that kind of angry.
In Wyoming?????????
Perhaps my memory has gone astray but I thought someone here posted that a lot of Californians have moved to Casper and this kind of contamination soon followed.