No problem ... cause I'll just fix things with another Executive Order!
Posted on 12/15/2011 6:47:19 AM PST by Zakeet
A House-Senate conference committee has put the military prohibition on sodomy and bestiality back into the final version of the National Defense Authorization Act.
A spokesman for the House Armed Services Committee told CNSNews.com Wednesday that the Obama administration had “made its pitch” on repealing Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice related to sodomy -- but the members of the conference committee “were not persuaded” that the change was needed.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
No problem ... cause I'll just fix things with another Executive Order!
Wow.. some rare good news.
The Democrats will be tossing little hissy fits all day long over the loss of their bestiality privileges.
How can you be a queer in the military if sodomy is outlawed? Or, for that matter, if you have to pass a drug test?
Yes and no. Currently, “sodomy” is illegal between married couples in the military, so husband-wife oral sex is a court-martial offense that can lead to dishonorable discharge.
The K9 Corp is breathing a sigh of relief...
As per Rush, the Beltway boys in this Regime and this Congress are clueless, due to their arrogance and quest for power, to realize just how incensed We The People are. November 2012 can’t get here quick enough so we can clean the feces out of both Parties. Everyone I talk to wants “all” of them voted out in disgrace. Corrupt, amoral Career politicians need not apply.
So Dems and a few RINOs repealed DADT and now a soldier's homosexuality is legally out in the open in the military.(I assume this means the communication of those desires. ) But ‘sex’ between two of the same-sex =sodomy is still against the military justice code? Go figure.....
More ironic, the SCOTUS ruled that homo-sexual sodomy was a US constitutional right that cannot be outlawed by states repealing all those state laws, Thank Justice O Conner for that.
I encourage you to check up on the meaning of sodomy. The queers like to claim that the Bible refers to oral with a woman as sodomy, but that simply isn’t true. It specifically means anal sex between two men. If the military has expanded the meaning, they’ve done so after believing homosexual propaganda. It would be great for them, the gays, if they could claim that almost anyone (someone who’s wife has given them a bj is also a sodomite, but that’s simply not true). Sorry.
But...but...but virtually every Republican Senator endorsed dropping sodomy and bestiality earlier this week. They don´t read what they vote on either?
We came very close to being another Sodom and Gomorrah. We’re not out of the woods yet.
I had thought at the time that this would have been a perfect chance to hoist the perverts on their own petard. Remember that DADT was a Clinton dodge to allow homosexuals to serve as long as they remained "in the closet" about their behavior -- as such, I never understood why conservatives fought so hard against its repeal.
The UCMJ wasn't being changed -- which was the fatal flaw from the liberals' perspective. By repealing DADT, they think they've allowed the perverts to serve openly, but technically, any who do "come out" expose themselves to court-martial via Article 125.
It would be a career-ender, but I'd just love to see an officer refer these degenerates to court-martial citing Article 125.
This is the part I am pondering. I assume what this means is they can state their desires but not be caught acting on them. How would this affect them negatively ? How about if they pair up with the same sex, the relationship turns bad (almost enviable) and one decides to get revenge on the other one who is in the military and turns him in for sodomy?
In addition add the potential complication of same-sex marriage in some states that they are sueing for to be recognized by the military.
Once you start defining civil rights protected class's based on personal desires little makes sense anymore.
Well I have NO problem with “sodomy” being illegal. Why anybody in their right mind would think the organ created by God to remove waste from the human body was created for sexual pleasure defies logic.The ban was instituted when our
Congress was yet run by Moral and Religious people who wanted
guidlines to encourage Morality in our Armed Forces.The the prohibition put an end to sodomy? or attempted sodomy? No But neither has it encouraged immorality and the spread of diseases commonly found bothering those who engage in such abnormal behavior.
Shall be punished— is a subjective clause in that the whole deal relies on inquiry and the unit commander has general control over such. Only rarely is the command to override the authority of the Unit Commander made manifest.
Is sodomy —or attempted sodomy a civil right? I have read somewhat reasonable reports that suggest sodomy is not a civil right.(at least it was not until the US supreme court tossed
Bowers v. Hardwick in Lawrence v. Texas,2003)
Assuming sodomy is limited to anal sex only is incorrect. Sodomy also includes oral sex...
Still support it being illegal?
I do not believe that and challenge you to present something credible in your defense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.