i agree that Gingrich was right on the Palestinians being invented as a people, but i also agree with Romney that that was incendiary.
To paraphrase Rush, how can something be incendiary to a people who are already on fire?
Yeah, real incendiary......now they might fly planes full of people into building full of people.....oh, nevermind.
How does throwing a match into a burning building make it incendiary?
“but i also agree with Romney that that was incendiary”
Newt isn’t president. He holds no office. As a free citizen, he can say whatever he wants to. The truth trumps PC every time. FPC.
There is not, and never has been a nation called Palestine. Israel has existed for thousands of years. Muslim radicals want to create a new country called "Palestine". on exactly the same land as Israel, destroying Israel in the process. Why is it "incendiary" to state this?
“i agree that Gingrich was right on the Palestinians being invented as a people, but i also agree with Romney that that was incendiary.”
Its impossible to be incendiary with people who never stopped lobbing rockets and committing acts of terror worldwide.
Romney promised us that if elected President he would never make a move without calling somebody for permission first. Not a great quality in the Leader of Free World.
So are you saying that when Prez Reagan said “Tear down this wall!”, he was incendiary? Should he not have allowed the countries involved to speak for themselves?
I call BULL. I want a president who has values and speaks them. Newt spoke truth and stood by it. Romney looked weak and lacked leadership when he whined on and on that he would let Bebe handle this. Are we friends of Israel or not?