Something is wrong with the premise that Fast and Furious was intended to rile the publilc toward more draconian anti-gun laws. There are so many ways that it simply wouldn’t accomplish that goal.
The guns were going across the border into Mexico. No one in this country would be particularly upset about deaths in the Mexican drug war. The dead border agent could not have been part of the plan.
Is it possible there was another goal? Mexican drug cartels are flush with money. Could there have been a monetary payoff perhaps? A quid-pro-quo not dissimilar to Solyndra, but which couldn’t have been a direct payment?
It is eerie to watch the Democrats on the House committe attempt to, in concert, keep the conversation revovling around gun control. Could they have been instructed to do so? By....someone higher up?
There are just too many other ways the Dems could achieve the goal of seizing our guns. Guns in the hands of illegal drug lords only inspires us to want to hang onto our guns even more, for protection.
Something smells here.
Think 'Israel vs "occupied territories"' and view it through the lens of Agenda 21.