So much for the Iranian denial. Mossad strikes again . . .
1 posted on
11/30/2011 4:25:33 AM PST by
jhpigott
To: MississippiMan; ctdonath2; LibertyRocks; GonzoGOP; b4its2late; bert; maquiladora; hennie pennie; ...
2 posted on
11/30/2011 4:27:33 AM PST by
jhpigott
(North Korea - The land of lousy options)
To: jhpigott
Cheers!
3 posted on
11/30/2011 4:33:08 AM PST by
TSgt
(BEAT OBAMA WITH A CAIN!)
To: jhpigott
So much for the Iranian denial. Mossad strikes again . . .
Don't you just know that the Iranians are pretty peeved about this. Hehe.
4 posted on
11/30/2011 4:36:48 AM PST by
ZX12R
(FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
To: jhpigott
5 posted on
11/30/2011 4:36:52 AM PST by
TSgt
(BEAT OBAMA WITH A CAIN!)
To: jhpigott
I find it provocative that the Iranians are still using uranium hexafluoride and centrifuges to separate isotopes. The US declassified that process in 1954, assuming that on one would ever try to build a nuclear weapon that way again. If true, the Iranians will probably never have a sizable nuclear arsenal, though even on nuclear bomb can ruin your whole day.
To: jhpigott
Whether or not MOSSAD was involved, it benefits the Israelis to place as much doubt in the minds of the Iranians as possible. If the Israelis are hinting that they were involved, they probably weren’t, but I suppose the best posture for the Israelis is to behave in the same manner, whether they were involved or not. Keep ‘em guessing.
To: jhpigott
Iranian version of a Homer Simpson asleep at the controls is what happened.
To: jhpigott
-——”So far no report of a major explosion has been heard from any government body in Isfahan,” he was quoted as saying.——
That is likely a true statement. It does not deny the incident, it says there is no government report.
The report is confusing in that is seems to mix an explosion involving uranium conversion with missile explosion.
The comments include a question......”Radioactivity” That is a very good question.
The attack on the British Embassy was made to distract attention from Isfahan. I conclude that if the mad mullahs are hurt bad enough to attack an embassy to divert attention, the incident is bad, very bad. The attack by unknown and unannounced foes must be driving the mullahs crazy
14 posted on
11/30/2011 5:09:12 AM PST by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
To: jhpigott
Who are those guys?
15 posted on
11/30/2011 5:09:33 AM PST by
McGruff
(Hold the House, retake the Senate.)
To: jhpigott
Somebody sneaking a smoke in the chemical storage shed? Damn those smokers! :)
18 posted on
11/30/2011 5:38:23 AM PST by
Mister Da
(The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
To: jhpigott
Yippy Ky Yay
Let’s hope the CIA informants whose lives were sacrificed when they were betrayed by loose lips and stupid oversight... have been partly avenged, and this is only a beginning
19 posted on
11/30/2011 5:39:16 AM PST by
silverleaf
(common sense is not so common- voltaire)
To: jhpigott
All I can say is; Allah Akbar!
22 posted on
11/30/2011 5:52:14 AM PST by
umgud
To: jhpigott
Newman !23 posted on
11/30/2011 5:54:02 AM PST by
Tainan
(Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
To: jhpigott
I'm glad there are things out there that we don't know about!
These “accidents” are getting routine!
26 posted on
11/30/2011 5:56:36 AM PST by
HereInTheHeartland
(I love how the FR spellchecker doesn't recognize the word "Obama")
To: jhpigott
I wouldn’t want to be the guys in charge of security and safety at that facility. I imagine they are getting the Darth Vader “you have failed me for the last time” speech.
27 posted on
11/30/2011 6:04:55 AM PST by
ZX12R
(FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
To: jhpigott
There needs to be more splosions there....
36 posted on
11/30/2011 11:27:07 AM PST by
b4its2late
(Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the former.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
