Skip to comments.
Now It's Newt's Turn for an Anal Exam, But How Come It's Never Mitt Romney's?
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2011/11/18/now_it_s_newt_s_turn_for_an_anal_exam_but_how_come_it_s ^
| November 18, 2011
| Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 11/19/2011 3:29:54 AM PST by sheikdetailfeather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 last
To: MNJohnnie
Forget Newt, Cain is our man
To: Longbow1969
Well, like I said, if it comes down to Romney vs. Newt, I'll have to think about it. And the more I think about it, the more I think I would lean towards Romney, given those options.
I've said all along it's a pathetically weak field. The conservative/tea party based failed to put up a quality candidate. Hell, they almost insist on candidates lacking a solid record and background these says.
The establishment also failed to put up a clear choice. Romney is the best they could do. So who's the best of them? I have no idea. I do think at this point it will come down to Newt or Romney, and that is far from a clear choice, imo.
62
posted on
11/19/2011 8:59:09 AM PST
by
Huck
(Not sure if I can pick one.)
To: MNJohnnie
Just out of curiosity, who are you supporting?
63
posted on
11/19/2011 10:43:23 AM PST
by
big'ol_freeper
("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan)
To: MNJohnnie
RE: Odd when you were racing around here trash talking everyone not Newt
I've not trashed talked talked down any candidate other than Mitt Romney and Ron Paul, and I've been doing that since the last election cycle because Romney is the only candidate with a completely liberal record, and Paul is borderline insane (but right on many issues).
RE: Guess we are only helping the enemy when we ask tough questions about your St Newt hmm?
My St. Newt? That's interesting since I support Herman Cain. Have been since the day he announced. I would like to see a Cain/Newt ticket though. The only two GOP candidates I might not be able to bring myself to vote for would be Mitt Romney or Ron Paul. I'd have to think long and hard in those two cases.
64
posted on
11/19/2011 10:57:23 AM PST
by
big'ol_freeper
("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan)
To: sheikdetailfeather
What is weird is that both the establishment Republican elite want Romney as the GOP nominee, and so do the rats, who are salivating at the thought of running against the flip-flopping Mittens RomneyCare. The TV ads have already written themselves. If, "I was for it before I was against it", was bad for John Kerry, imagine what the rats would do to Mittens?
This is an old cartoon, so don't forget the "Pro-Communist Health Care" and "Anti-Communist Health Care" podiums:
To: MNJohnnie
Johnnie, Cain is out of it now. It’s over.
66
posted on
11/20/2011 2:57:06 AM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson