Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/16/2011 7:12:07 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Nachum

she’s not going to recuse herself.

liberals are arrogant.

the rules and laws do not apply to them.


2 posted on 11/16/2011 7:15:24 PM PST by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Wow, Holder must be quaking in his boots.


3 posted on 11/16/2011 7:16:58 PM PST by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Death/0bamacare is the reason she was put on the Supreme Court.


5 posted on 11/16/2011 7:19:26 PM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Again how did Holder know that Kagen needed to be removed from discussions of Obamacare before she became a USSC Justice?

Check out this video of Sen. Lee (R-Utah) asking Holder a question about Obamacare. His question begins at 110:50 into the video. The video does not need to load you can jump straight to 110.50

"Oversight of the U.S. Department of Justice" 11-08-2011

6 posted on 11/16/2011 7:19:50 PM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


8 posted on 11/16/2011 7:20:07 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

I would bet the farm on her not recusing herself.

These people have no conscience.


9 posted on 11/16/2011 7:22:40 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

The ‘law makers’ have systematically and with malice of forethought, over the yeas, passed laws that allow them all to be lawless and untouchable.

Her own words are evidence that she is biased.

With se=such evidence, it should not be her decision alone whether or not to recuse.


11 posted on 11/16/2011 7:26:23 PM PST by maine-iac7 (ALWAYS WATCH THE OTHER HAND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

In this case, Obama hired her BECAUSE of her support of Obama”care.”


16 posted on 11/16/2011 7:47:06 PM PST by Graewoulf ( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Please Donate!!

FReepathon Day 47!!

19 posted on 11/16/2011 10:31:40 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREHEE REPUBLIC BY DONATING NOW! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

And nothing will come of it. She’s a lock to vote to uphold this nightmare and Kennedy will somehow be “gotten to” by the Obama mafia and then the deal is done.


22 posted on 11/17/2011 6:36:45 AM PST by Buckeye Battle Cry (Mittt Romney - he lacks the courage of his absence of convictions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

As a potential juror, I have been challenged and dismissed for infinitely LESS.

The first question they ask of a judge or juror is:

Do you know any of the parties in this case, or have anyone in your family employed in the same profession as anyone in this case, or have any interest whatsoever in this case personally?

It is the judge’s responsibility to recuse oneself if any of these factors are true.


24 posted on 11/17/2011 6:54:49 AM PST by left that other site (Psalm 122:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson